Mucus-depleted frog palate as a model for the study of mucociliary clearance

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Aug;69(2):424-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.69.2.424.

Abstract

To better understand the frog palate model of mucociliary transport, we measured the transport rate of mucus (MTR) from the leopard frog, Rana pipiens, and from the bullfrog, R. catesbeiana, recorded the stability of the MTR over a period of hours and days and over the course of 1 yr, and measured the viscoelasticity, percent solid composition, and spinnability (filance) of mucus from both species. Bullfrog mucus was less rigid than leopard frog mucus (log G* at 1 rad/s 2.09 vs. 2.61; P less than 0.01) and had a higher viscosity-to-elasticity ratio (tan delta at 1 rad/s 0.36 vs. 0.26; P less than 0.05). It also had a lower solids content (8.71 vs. 13.72%; P = 0.02), and there was a trend to lower spinnability for bullfrog mucus (filance 26.7 vs. 33.5 mm). These data suggest that bullfrog mucus has viscoelastic properties similar to normal mammalian respiratory mucus and leopard frog mucus has viscoelasticity similar to sputum samples. MTR was significantly slower in the winter than in the summer months (17 vs. 30 mm/min; P less than 0.0001). Although the leopard frog palate could be used for at least 7 consecutive days without exhaustion, bullfrog palates could be used for only 5 days. Palates of either species could generally be tested for 6 h/day without a significant decrease in MTR. These data clarify some of the sources of variability in the use of this system and suggest methods of standardization.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Elasticity
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Models, Biological
  • Mucociliary Clearance / physiology*
  • Mucus / chemistry
  • Mucus / physiology
  • Palate, Soft / physiology*
  • Periodicity
  • Rana catesbeiana
  • Rana pipiens
  • Seasons
  • Species Specificity
  • Viscosity