Screening mammography beliefs and recommendations: a web-based survey of primary care physicians
- PMID: 22309456
- PMCID: PMC3293074
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-32
Screening mammography beliefs and recommendations: a web-based survey of primary care physicians
Abstract
Background: The appropriateness and cost-effectiveness of screening mammography (SM) for women younger than 50 and older than 74 years is debated in the clinical research community, among health care providers, and by the American public. This study explored primary care physicians' (PCPs) perceptions of the influence of clinical practice guidelines for SM; the recommendations for SM in response to hypothetical case scenarios; and the factors associated with perceived SM effectiveness and recommendations in the US from June to December 2009 before the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recently revised guidelines.
Methods: A nationally representative sample of 11,922 PCPs was surveyed using a web-based questionnaire. The response rate was 5.7% (684); (41%) 271 family physicians (FP), (36%) 232 general internal medicine physicians (IM), (23%) 150 obstetrician-gynaecologists (OBG), and (0.2%) 31 others. Cross-sectional analysis examined PCPs perceived effectiveness of SM, and recommendation for SM in response to hypothetical case scenarios. PCPs responses were measured using 4-5 point adjectival scales. Differences in perceived effectiveness and recommendations for SM were examined after adjusting for PCPs specialty, race/ethnicity, and the US region.
Results: Compared to IM and FP, OBG considered SM more effective in reducing breast cancer mortality among women aged 40-49 years (p = 0.003). Physicians consistently recommended mammography to women aged 50-69 years with no differences by specialty (p = 0.11). However, 94% of OBG "always recommended" SM to younger and 86% of older women compared to 81% and 67% for IM and 84% and 59% for FP respectively (p = < .001). In ordinal regression analysis, OBG specialty was a significant predictor for perceived higher SM effectiveness and recommendations for younger and older women. In evaluating hypothetical scenarios, overall PCPs would recommend SM for the 80 year woman with CHF with a significant variation by specialty (38% of OBG, 18% of FP, 17% of IM; p = < .001).
Conclusions: A majority of physicians, especially OBG, favour aggressive breast cancer screening for women from 40 through 79 years of age, including women with short life expectancy. Policy interventions should focus on educating providers to provide tailored recommendations for mammography based on individualized cancer risk, health status, and preferences.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Differences among primary care physicians' adherence to 2009 ACOG guidelines for cervical cancer screening.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 May;23(5):397-403. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4475. Epub 2013 Dec 31. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014. PMID: 24380500
-
Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):449-457. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3973-y. Epub 2017 Jan 9. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28070772 Free PMC article.
-
Guideline-inconsistent breast cancer screening for women over 50: a vignette-based survey.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):82-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2567-1. Epub 2013 Aug 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 23943421 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations by Primary Care Providers Surveyed in Wisconsin.J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2553-2559. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05922-y. Epub 2020 Jun 3. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32495085 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Data from a national survey of United States primary care physicians on genetic risk scores for common disease prevention.Data Brief. 2023 Dec 8;52:109930. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109930. eCollection 2024 Feb. Data Brief. 2023. PMID: 38093856 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes of Gynecologists toward Referral of Women to Breast Imaging Clinics for Breast Cancer Screening or Diagnosis.Radiologie (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;63(Suppl 2):108-112. doi: 10.1007/s00117-023-01225-5. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Radiologie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 37792033 English.
-
Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners' Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(13):2998-3020. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4. Epub 2023 May 4. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37142822 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived guideline clarity impacts guideline-concordant care for breast cancer screening in women age 40-49.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02190-w. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36803461 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived Barriers Among Clinicians and Older Adults Aged 65 and Older Regarding Use of Life Expectancy to Inform Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review and Comparison.Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Aug;80(4):372-385. doi: 10.1177/10775587231153269. Epub 2023 Feb 18. Med Care Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 36800914 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Woolf SH. The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. p. 162. - PubMed
-
- Barbieri RL. Access to screening mammography: Priceless. OBG Management.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
