Pay for performance in health care: an international overview of initiatives
- PMID: 22311954
- DOI: 10.1177/1077558711432891
Pay for performance in health care: an international overview of initiatives
Abstract
Pay for performance (P4P) has become a popular approach to performance improvement in health care. Most of the P4P literature has focused on the United States and there is limited insight in the characteristics of major programs initiated in other countries. This article systematically describes and reviews P4P programs outside the United States. Our literature search identified 13 programs initiated in 9 countries. Although the programs share many similarities, they differ in several important respects, also when compared with the typical P4P program in the United States. In addition, there are clearly possibilities to increase incentive strength and minimize incentives for undesired behavior. In part, observed heterogeneity will be a consequence of contextual differences, but design choices often also seem to be made arbitrarily. In designing their programs, purchasers are hampered by limited knowledge of the influence of specific design choices and effective strategies to mitigate undesired behavior.
Similar articles
-
Pay-for-performance in safety net settings: issues, opportunities, and challenges for the future.J Healthc Manag. 2010 Mar-Apr;55(2):132-41; discussion 141-2. J Healthc Manag. 2010. PMID: 20402368
-
The response of physician groups to P4P incentives.Am J Manag Care. 2007 May;13(5):249-55. Am J Manag Care. 2007. PMID: 17488190
-
Physicians respond to pay-for-performance incentives: larger incentives yield greater participation.Am J Manag Care. 2009 May;15(5):305-10. Am J Manag Care. 2009. PMID: 19435398
-
A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality.Health Policy. 2007 Jan;80(1):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 Apr 19. Health Policy. 2007. PMID: 16624440 Review.
-
Innovative health reform models: pay-for-performance initiatives.Am J Manag Care. 2009 Dec;15(10 Suppl):S300-5. Am J Manag Care. 2009. PMID: 20088634 Review.
Cited by
-
The validity and reliability properties of a Persian version of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP2) questionnaire among Iranian students of health-related fields.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06139-x. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39402622 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative payment models in Dutch hospital care: what works, how, why and under what circumstances? Protocol for a realist evaluation study.BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e082372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082372. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39313291 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the uptake of incentivised physical health checks for people with serious mental illness: a cohort study in primary care.Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jun 27;74(744):e449-e455. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0532. Print 2024 Jul. Br J Gen Pract. 2024. PMID: 38914479 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: protocol for a rapid scoping review.BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 19;13(6):e072076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072076. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37336539 Free PMC article.
-
What About Offering a Financial Incentive Directly to Clinical Units to Encourage the Use of Biosimilars? Results of a Two-Year National Experiment in France.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Sep;21(5):799-811. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00812-w. Epub 2023 May 30. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023. PMID: 37253898 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
