Sex differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator outcomes: findings from a prospective defibrillator database
- PMID: 22312139
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00007
Sex differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator outcomes: findings from a prospective defibrillator database
Abstract
Background: Sex differences in the use and outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have not been fully studied.
Objective: To examine potential sex differences in ICD implantation and device outcomes.
Design: Health payer-mandated, prospective study of patients referred for ICD implantation, with comprehensive, longitudinal follow-up for complications, deaths, and device outcomes.
Setting: 18 ICD implantation and follow-up centers in Ontario, Canada.
Patients: 6021 patients (4733 men) referred for ICD implantation from February 2007 to July 2010.
Measurements: Multivariate-adjusted ICD implantation rate, complications up to day 45, multivariate-adjusted complications, device outcomes (including appropriate shocks and therapies), and deaths occurring during 1-year follow-up.
Results: Rates of ICD implantation were similar in men and women (relative risk, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.02]; P = 0.60). However, women were significantly more likely to experience major complications by 45 days (odds ratio, 1.78 [CI, 1.24 to 2.58]; P = 0.002) and 1 year (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91 [CI, 1.48 to 2.47]; P < 0.001) after implantation. Occurrence of any major or minor complication was also increased in women at both 45-day follow-up (odds ratio, 1.50 [CI, 1.12 to 2.00]; P = 0.006) and 1-year follow-up (HR, 1.55 [CI, 1.25 to 1.93]; P < 0.001). After implantation, women were less likely than men to receive appropriate ICD shock (HR, 0.69 [CI, 0.51 to 0.93]; P = 0.015) or appropriate therapy via shock or antitachycardia pacing (HR, 0.73 [CI, 0.59 to 0.90]; P = 0.003). Total mortality among defibrillator recipients did not differ between men and women (HR, 1.00 [CI, 0.64 to 1.55]; P = 0.99).
Limitation: The differential effects of sex on prereferral events were not examined.
Conclusion: Although ICD implantation rates were similar after referral to an electrophysiologist, women who underwent ICD implantation had greater risks for complications and were less likely to experience appropriate ICD-delivered therapies than men.
Primary funding source: Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.
Comment in
-
Is biology destiny or can we optimize care for all patients?Ann Intern Med. 2012 Feb 7;156(3):241-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00015. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22312145 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in women.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Feb 7;156(3):I30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22312155 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of short-term complications after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement: results from the Ontario ICD Database.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;4(2):136-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.959791. Epub 2011 Feb 15. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011. PMID: 21325209
-
Evaluation of early complications related to De Novo cardioverter defibrillator implantation insights from the Ontario ICD database.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):774-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.029. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20170816
-
Sex differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation indications and outcomes: lessons from the Nationwide Israeli-ICD Registry.Europace. 2014 Aug;16(8):1175-80. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu015. Epub 2014 Feb 19. Europace. 2014. PMID: 24554524
-
Association of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy with All-Cause Mortality-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Jan;39(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12766. Epub 2015 Nov 19. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016. PMID: 26470761 Review.
-
Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Propensity Score-Matched Studies.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e024756. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024756. Epub 2022 Jun 3. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35656975 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Sex and Gender Differences in Ventricular Arrhythmias.US Cardiol. 2023 Sep 19;17:e12. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.38. eCollection 2023. US Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 39559519 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sex Differences in Outcomes of Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for the Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Apr 5;11(4):116. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040116. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38667734 Free PMC article.
-
Underrepresentation of women in implantable cardioverter defibrillator trials.Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Mar 29;14:100120. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100120. eCollection 2022 Feb. Am Heart J Plus. 2022. PMID: 38560561 Free PMC article.
-
Sex differences in ICDs for primary prevention: Time to include women in ICD trials!Am Heart J Plus. 2022 May 4;16:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100141. eCollection 2022 Apr. Am Heart J Plus. 2022. PMID: 38559282 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cardiomyopathies in Women.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2024 Mar 14;20(2):59-69. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1368. eCollection 2024. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2024. PMID: 38495661 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical