Infusion of statistical science in comparative effectiveness research
- PMID: 22334463
- DOI: 10.1177/1740774511433044
Infusion of statistical science in comparative effectiveness research
Abstract
Purpose: We present a general introduction to comparative effectiveness research (CER) from a statistician's viewpoint and focus on how statisticians can contribute to the methodology of CER.
Conclusions: The statistical science community needs to determine the priorities for methodological research in CER, in collaboration with our colleagues in the aligned medical fields. CER requires that we apply a new paradigm - a focus on the patient. The emphasis on the patient is driven by patients themselves, the federal government, and private payers, in addition to the fact that there is a rising chronic disease burden that is making patient populations more heterogeneous. The availability of new technology and data sources introduces not only complexity but also opportunity. Statistical scientists should rise to meet these new demands and develop optimal, statistically valid approaches to CER, just as they have in agriculture and clinical trials.
Similar articles
-
Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.012. Am Heart J. 2010. PMID: 20598966 Review.
-
Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;149(6):804-12. doi: 10.1177/0194599813506539. Epub 2013 Oct 4. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013. PMID: 24098005
-
Invited article: comparative effectiveness research, evidence-based medicine, and the AAN.Neurology. 2010 Aug 10;75(6):562-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ec7f56. Neurology. 2010. PMID: 20697109
-
The implications of comparative effectiveness research for academic medicine.Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):684-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e941. Acad Med. 2011. PMID: 21512362
-
Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 1;30(34):4249-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.5967. Epub 2012 Oct 15. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 23071244 Review.
Cited by
-
The ACTTION Guide to Clinical Trials of Pain Treatments, part II: mitigating bias, maximizing value.Pain Rep. 2021 Jan 21;6(1):e886. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000886. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb. Pain Rep. 2021. PMID: 33521484 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Point-of-Care Clinical Trials in Sports Medicine Research: Identifying Effective Treatment Interventions Through Comparative Effectiveness Research.J Athl Train. 2020 Mar;55(3):217-228. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-307-18. Epub 2019 Oct 16. J Athl Train. 2020. PMID: 31618071 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptive designs for comparative effectiveness research trials.Clin Res Regul Aff. 2015;32(1):36-44. doi: 10.3109/10601333.2014.977490. Epub 2014 Nov 13. Clin Res Regul Aff. 2015. PMID: 27773984 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
