Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study

J Prosthodont. 2012 Jun;21(4):265-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00825.x. Epub 2012 Feb 19.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to determine the success rate of single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with zirconia copings generated with two CAD/CAM systems, compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) single-unit posterior FDPs after 5 years of function.

Materials and methods: From 2005 to 2006, 60 patients who needed a single-unit FDP on a first molar in the mandibular jaw (left or right) in a private office setting were included in this study. The 60 first mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20): in the control group (group C), 20 PFM FDPs were included. In the other two groups CAD/CAM technology was used for the fabrication of the zirconium-oxide copings: 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Procera system (group P, Nobel Biocare); 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Lava system (group L, 3M ESPE). For the ANOVA follow-up data, the clinical life table method was applied. The statistical analysis was performed using two nonparametric tests, the log-rank test for k-groups and the Fisher exact test.

Results: No statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) evaluated together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function; however, clinical data showed that technical problems, such as extended fracture of the veneering ceramic, tended to occur more frequently in the zirconia-ceramic FDP groups. The difference in the frequency of failure was statistically significant only in the comparison of groups C and P.

Conclusions: Even if no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) considered together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function, clinical data showed that the two zirconia-ceramic FDP groups tended to have more frequent clinical problems: for this reason all the clinical and technical variables related to the use of zirconia-ceramic FDPs generated with CAD/CAM systems should be carefully considered prior to all treatment procedures.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cementation / methods
  • Computer-Aided Design*
  • Crowns*
  • Dental Marginal Adaptation
  • Dental Porcelain / chemistry*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design*
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Dental Restoration Wear
  • Dental Veneers
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glass Ionomer Cements / chemistry
  • Gold Alloys / chemistry
  • Humans
  • Metal Ceramic Alloys / chemistry*
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Surface Properties
  • Survival Analysis
  • Titanium / chemistry
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult
  • Zirconium / chemistry*

Substances

  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Gold Alloys
  • Metal Ceramic Alloys
  • Procera
  • Dental Porcelain
  • Zirconium
  • Titanium
  • zirconium oxide