Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery
- PMID: 22341274
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.089
Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery
Abstract
Purpose: Although robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery has been aggressively marketed and rapidly adopted, there are few comparative effectiveness studies that support its purported advantages compared to open and laparoscopic surgery. We used a population based approach to assess use, costs and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for common robotic assisted urological procedures.
Materials and methods: From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample we identified the most common urological robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery procedures during the last quarter of 2008 as radical prostatectomy, nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy and pyeloplasty. Robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery and open surgery use, costs and inpatient outcomes were compared using propensity score methods.
Results: Robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery was performed for 52.7% of radical prostatectomies, 27.3% of pyeloplasties, 11.5% of partial nephrectomies and 2.3% of nephrectomies. For radical prostatectomy robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery was more prevalent than open surgery among white patients in high volume, urban hospitals (all p≤0.015). Geographic variations were found in the use of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery. Robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery and laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery were associated with shorter length of stay for all procedures, with robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery being the shortest for radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy (all p<0.001). For most procedures robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery and laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery resulted in fewer deaths, complications, transfusions and more routine discharges. However, robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery was more costly than laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for most procedures.
Conclusions: While robotic assisted and laparoscopic surgery are associated with fewer deaths, complications, transfusions and shorter length of hospital stay compared to open surgery, robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery is more costly than laparoscopic and open surgery. Additional studies are needed to better delineate the comparative and cost-effectiveness of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery relative to laparoscopic surgery and open surgery.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment.J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1398. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.119. Epub 2012 Feb 16. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22341284 No abstract available.
-
Editorial comment.J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1398-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.120. Epub 2012 Feb 16. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22341286 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Hospital volume, utilization, costs and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2012 May;187(5):1632-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.071. Epub 2012 Mar 14. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22425094
-
Does robotic assistance confer an economic benefit during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy?J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):671-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 Apr 18. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24747652
-
Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.J Urol. 2014 Apr;191(4):907-12. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.099. Epub 2013 Oct 29. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24184365
-
Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi: 10.3310/hta16410. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 23127367 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is robotic surgery cost-effective: yes.Curr Opin Urol. 2012 Jan;22(1):61-5. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834d543f. Curr Opin Urol. 2012. PMID: 22037320 Review.
Cited by
-
Utilizing a modified-Postoperative Morbidity Survey for assessing morbidity after laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective observational study.BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02778-1. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 39468454 Free PMC article.
-
Analyzing the influence of expanding multispecialty adoption of robotic surgery on robotic urologic care A decade-long assessment of two Canadian academic hospitals.Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Jun;18(6):190-193. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8524. Can Urol Assoc J. 2024. PMID: 38381925 Free PMC article.
-
Advancements in robotic surgery: innovations, challenges and future prospects.J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 17;18(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01801-w. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38231455 Review.
-
One-year healthcare costs after robotic-assisted and laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy: a cohort study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 14;23(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10111-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37838666 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes between 3D and 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 19;13:1249683. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1249683. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37795432 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
