Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations--a commentary on two AMEE Guides
- PMID: 22364458
- DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.643266
Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations--a commentary on two AMEE Guides
Abstract
As great emphasis is rightly placed upon the importance of assessment to judge the quality of our future healthcare professionals, it is appropriate not only to choose the most appropriate assessment method, but to continually monitor the quality of the tests themselves, in a hope that we may continually improve the process. This article stresses the importance of quality control mechanisms in the exam cycle and briefly outlines some of the key psychometric concepts including reliability measures, factor analysis, generalisability theory and item response theory. The importance of such analyses for the standard setting procedures is emphasised. This article also accompanies two new AMEE Guides in Medical Education (Tavakol M, Dennick R. Post-examination Analysis of Objective Tests: AMEE Guide No. 54 and Tavakol M, Dennick R. 2012. Post examination analysis of objective test data: Monitoring and improving the quality of high stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No. 66) which provide the reader with practical examples of analysis and interpretation, in order to help develop valid and reliable tests.
Comment on
-
Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No. 66.Med Teach. 2012;34(3):e161-75. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651178. Med Teach. 2012. PMID: 22364473
Similar articles
-
Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No. 66.Med Teach. 2012;34(3):e161-75. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651178. Med Teach. 2012. PMID: 22364473
-
Post-examination analysis of objective tests.Med Teach. 2011;33(6):447-58. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.564682. Med Teach. 2011. PMID: 21609174
-
Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):836-45. doi: 10.1080/01421590802402247. Med Teach. 2008. PMID: 19117221
-
Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100.Med Teach. 2016;38(1):3-17. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1072619. Epub 2015 Aug 27. Med Teach. 2016. PMID: 26313700 Review.
-
General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57.Med Teach. 2011;33(10):783-97. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.611022. Med Teach. 2011. PMID: 21942477 Review.
Cited by
-
Psychometrics for physicians: everything a clinician needs to know about assessments in medical education.Int J Med Educ. 2022 Apr 22;13:100-106. doi: 10.5116/ijme.625f.bfb1. Int J Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35462355 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Has the OSCE Met Its Final Demise? Rebalancing Clinical Assessment Approaches in the Peri-Pandemic World.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 21;9:825502. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.825502. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35265639 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
