Accuracy of rapid influenza diagnostic tests: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 22371850
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00403
Accuracy of rapid influenza diagnostic tests: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Timely diagnosis of influenza can help clinical management.
Purpose: To examine the accuracy of rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) in adults and children with influenza-like illness and evaluate factors associated with higher accuracy.
Data sources: PubMed and EMBASE through December 2011; BIOSIS and Web of Science through March 2010; and citations of articles, guidelines, reviews, and manufacturers.
Study selection: Studies that compared RIDTs with a reference standard of either reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (first choice) or viral culture.
Data extraction: Reviewers abstracted study data by using a standardized form and assessed quality by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria.
Data synthesis: 159 studies evaluated 26 RIDTs, and 35% were conducted during the H1N1 pandemic. Failure to report whether results were assessed in a blinded manner and the basis for patient recruitment were important quality concerns. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 62.3% (95% CI, 57.9% to 66.6%) and 98.2% (CI, 97.5% to 98.7%), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 34.5 (CI, 23.8 to 45.2) and 0.38 (CI, 0.34 to 0.43), respectively. Sensitivity estimates were highly heterogeneous, which was partially explained by lower sensitivity in adults (53.9% [CI, 47.9% to 59.8%]) than in children (66.6% [CI, 61.6% to 71.7%]) and a higher sensitivity for influenza A (64.6% [CI, 59.0% to 70.1%) than for influenza B (52.2% [CI, 45.0% to 59.3%).
Limitation: Incomplete reporting limited the ability to assess the effect of important factors, such as specimen type and duration of influenza symptoms, on diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusion: Influenza can be ruled in but not ruled out through the use of RIDTs. Sensitivity varies across populations, but it is higher in children than in adults and for influenza A than for influenza B.
Primary funding source: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Similar articles
-
Sensitivity of rapid influenza antigen tests in the diagnosis of pandemic (H1N1)2009 compared with the standard rRT-PCR technique during the 2009 pandemic in Turkey.Scand J Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;42(11-12):902-5. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2010.502903. Epub 2010 Jul 22. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20662619
-
Accuracy of bedside antigen tests in the diagnosis of new influenza A/H1N1v infection.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Feb;17(2):235-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03235.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011. PMID: 20384708
-
Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) Virus - United States, 2009.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Aug 7;58(30):826-9. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009. PMID: 19661856
-
Diagnostic tests for influenza infection.Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011 Feb;23(1):91-7. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328341ebd9. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011. PMID: 21150446 Review.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Novel and Traditional Rapid Tests for Influenza Infection Compared With Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):394-409. doi: 10.7326/M17-0848. Epub 2017 Sep 5. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28869986 Review.
Cited by
-
A new antigen test device for rapid influenza A and B detection.Heliyon. 2024 Jul 2;10(13):e33979. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33979. eCollection 2024 Jul 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39055805 Free PMC article.
-
Performance evaluation of influenza a rapid antigen test and PCR among nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples.Pract Lab Med. 2024 Jun 7;40:e00416. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00416. eCollection 2024 May. Pract Lab Med. 2024. PMID: 38989481 Free PMC article.
-
Performance evaluation of the Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B antigens using mid-turbinate nasal swabs.J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Jul 16;62(7):e0020724. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00207-24. Epub 2024 Jun 18. J Clin Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38888305 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Presentation, Risk Factors, and Comparison of Laboratory Diagnostics for Seasonal Influenza Virus Among Cambodians From 2007 to 2020.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 22;11(3):ofae062. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae062. eCollection 2024 Mar. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38524221 Free PMC article.
-
At-home testing for respiratory viruses: a minireview of the current landscape.J Clin Microbiol. 2024 May 8;62(5):e0031223. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00312-23. Epub 2024 Mar 4. J Clin Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38436246 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical