Rationale for treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms: actuarial analysis of natural history risk versus treatment risk for coiling or clipping based on 14,050 patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database
- PMID: 22381870
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.01.038
Rationale for treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms: actuarial analysis of natural history risk versus treatment risk for coiling or clipping based on 14,050 patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database
Abstract
Objective: The treatment of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms has been questioned based on the results of the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. Our objective was to compare natural history rupture risk versus treatment risk for coiling and clipping small unruptured aneurysms using data in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
Methods: Data for clipping and coiling of unruptured aneurysms was collected from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2002-2008. Treatment risks were adjusted for age, gender, and medical comorbidities. Logistic regression models were used to create curves depicting the estimated probability of poor outcome as a function of patient age for clipping and coiling. These treatment risk curves were compared against natural history actuarial risk curves calculated from four prominent studies.
Results: There were 14,050 hospitalizations: 7439(53%) coiling; 6611(47%) clipping. For patients who underwent coiling or clipping, the mortality rate was 2.17% and 2.66%, and the morbidity rate was 2.16% and 4.75%, respectively. The adjusted risk of poor outcome from clipping and coiling, when modeled against most natural history studies, demonstrates a treatment benefit for clipping for patients <70 years and for coiling patients <81 years. Models using the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms data demonstrate a treatment benefit for clipping for patients <61 years and for coiling for patients <70 years.
Conclusions: Both clipping and coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms are safe. This analysis demonstrates rationale for clipping small unruptured aneurysms in patients <61-70 years and coiling small unruptured aneurysms in patients <70-80 years. Treatment beyond these age ranges is associated with increased risk of poor outcome.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
When do unruptured aneurysms deserve treatment based on natural history? Data and outcomes from the National Inpatient Sample database.World Neurosurg. 2013 Mar-Apr;79(3-4):423-4. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.04.026. Epub 2012 Apr 28. World Neurosurg. 2013. PMID: 22548886 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Incidence of seizures or epilepsy after clipping or coiling of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the nationwide inpatient sample database: 2002-2007.Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(3):644-50; discussion 650. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821bc46d. Neurosurgery. 2011. PMID: 21499155
-
Incidence of ventricular shunt placement for hydrocephalus with clipping versus coiling for ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database: 2002 to 2007.World Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;76(6):548-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.05.054. World Neurosurg. 2011. PMID: 22251503
-
Length of stay and total hospital charges of clipping versus coiling for ruptured and unruptured adult cerebral aneurysms in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database 2002 to 2006.Stroke. 2010 Feb;41(2):337-42. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.569269. Epub 2009 Dec 31. Stroke. 2010. PMID: 20044522
-
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Coiling Versus Microsurgical Clipping for Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;84(4):942-53. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.073. Epub 2015 Jun 18. World Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 26093360 Review.
-
Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review.BMC Neurol. 2012 Sep 22;12:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-99. BMC Neurol. 2012. PMID: 22998483 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Why should we focus on small aneurysms? A comprehensive update of recent findings.Pol J Radiol. 2024 Jan 12;89:e13-e23. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2024.134424. eCollection 2024. Pol J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38371893 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Procedural complications in patients undergoing microsurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience with 1923 aneurysms.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Feb;164(2):525-535. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04996-9. Epub 2021 Sep 25. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022. PMID: 34562151
-
Readmission Trends Related to Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment.Front Neurol. 2021 May 20;12:590751. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.590751. eCollection 2021. Front Neurol. 2021. PMID: 34093383 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of clipping and coiling in elderly patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms.J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):811-818. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152028. Epub 2016 May 20. J Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 27203150 Free PMC article.
-
Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at 7 Tesla: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography.Eur Radiol. 2017 Jan;27(1):354-364. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4323-5. Epub 2016 Mar 18. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 26993650
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
