Distressing adverse events after antidepressant switch in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial: influence of adverse events during initial treatment with citalopram on development of subsequent adverse events with an alternative antidepressant
- PMID: 22392456
- DOI: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01020.x
Distressing adverse events after antidepressant switch in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial: influence of adverse events during initial treatment with citalopram on development of subsequent adverse events with an alternative antidepressant
Abstract
Study objective: To determine whether distressing adverse events (DAEs) experienced during initial antidepressant treatment are associated with subsequent DAEs after switching to a second antidepressant.
Design: Secondary analysis of data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial.
Setting: Primary care and psychiatric care facilities.
Patients: A total of 727 outpatients aged 18-75 years with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder who failed first-step therapy with citalopram and were switched to second-step monotherapy with an alternative antidepressant.
Measurements and main results: In the STAR*D trial, patient-reported DAEs were entered into the Patient-Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE). In this secondary analysis, data from PRISE were used to determine the incidence of DAEs during first-step treatment with citalopram and second-step treatment with sustained-release bupropion, sertraline, or extended-release venlafaxine. Regression models were used to compare the risk of adverse events during second-step treatment between those who reported similar adverse events during first-step treatment and those who did not, while controlling for potential confounders. Of the 727 patients analyzed, DAEs were reported by 514 patients (70.7%) during first-step treatment and 626 (86.1%) during second-step treatment; no significant differences were observed among the three second-step treatment groups. Overall, patients reporting DAEs during first-step treatment were more likely to report DAEs during second-step treatment (risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.20). After controlling for confounders, patients were significantly more likely to report DAEs specific to a body function or organ system, such as those involving the genitourinary system (RR 3.39, 95% CI 2.41-4.78) or sexual functioning (RR 2.75, 95% CI 2.29-3.29), if the patients had reported similar events during initial treatment.
Conclusion: Patients who experienced DAEs with initial antidepressant treatment were likely to report similar adverse events after switching to an alternative antidepressant, even when subsequent treatment is from a different class of antidepressants.
© 2012 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Risk of adverse events in treatment-resistant depression: propensity-score-matched comparison of antidepressant augment and switch strategies.Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012 Mar-Apr;34(2):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 12. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012. PMID: 22079151 Clinical Trial.
-
Treating depression after initial treatment failure: directly comparing switch and augmenting strategies in STAR*D.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;32(1):114-9. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31823f705d. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012. PMID: 22198447 Clinical Trial.
-
Switching to sertraline or venlafaxine after failure of SSRIs treatment in major depressive disorder: an economic evaluation of the STAR*D trial.J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 May;95 Suppl 5:S29-37. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012. PMID: 22934442
-
Comparative Benefits and Harms of Antidepressant, Psychological, Complementary, and Exercise Treatments for Major Depression: An Evidence Report for a Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 1;164(5):331-41. doi: 10.7326/M15-1813. Epub 2015 Dec 8. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26857743 Review.
-
Pharmacogenomics with antidepressants in the STAR*D study.Pharmacogenomics. 2008 Jul;9(7):935-46. doi: 10.2217/14622416.9.7.935. Pharmacogenomics. 2008. PMID: 18597655 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Gepirone-ER on Sexual Function in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.J Clin Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 21;85(4):24m15357. doi: 10.4088/JCP.24m15357. J Clin Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 39431906 Clinical Trial.
-
Drug Response-Related DNA Methylation Changes in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder.Front Neurosci. 2021 May 13;15:674273. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.674273. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34054421 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Collaborative care for depression and anxiety disorders: results and lessons learned from the Danish cluster-randomized Collabri trials.BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Nov 18;21(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01299-3. BMC Fam Pract. 2020. PMID: 33203365 Free PMC article.
-
Collaborative care for panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder and social phobia in general practice: study protocol for three cluster-randomised, superiority trials.Trials. 2017 Aug 16;18(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2120-3. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28814317 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Collaborative care for depression in general practice: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2064-7. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28732523 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
