Effect of tribal language use on colorectal cancer screening among American Indians
- PMID: 22402926
- PMCID: PMC4966876
- DOI: 10.1007/s10903-012-9598-2
Effect of tribal language use on colorectal cancer screening among American Indians
Abstract
American Indians have one of the lowest colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates for any racial/ethnic group in the U.S., yet reasons for their low screening participation are poorly understood. We examine whether tribal language use is associated with knowledge and use of CRC screening in a community-based sample of American Indians. Using logistic regression to estimate the association between tribal language use and CRC test knowledge and receipt we found participants speaking primarily English were no more aware of CRC screening tests than those speaking primarily a tribal language (OR = 1.16 [0.29, 4.63]). Participants who spoke only a tribal language at home (OR = 1.09 [0.30, 4.00]) and those who spoke both a tribal language and English (OR = 1.74 [0.62, 4.88]) also showed comparable odds of receipt of CRC screening. Study findings failed to support the concept that use of a tribal language is a barrier to CRC screening among American Indians.
Similar articles
-
Colorectal cancer screening among American Indians in a Pacific Northwest tribe: Cowlitz Tribal BRFSS Project, 2009-2010.Public Health Rep. 2014 May;129(3):280-8. doi: 10.1177/003335491412900310. Public Health Rep. 2014. PMID: 24791026 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer Screening on the Hopi Reservation: A Model for Success in a Native American Community.J Community Health. 2015 Dec;40(6):1165-72. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0043-z. J Community Health. 2015. PMID: 26091896 Free PMC article.
-
Race, Poverty, and Mental Health Drive Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities in the Veterans Health Administration.Med Care. 2019 Oct;57(10):773-780. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001186. Med Care. 2019. PMID: 31415338
-
Views, barriers, and suggestions for colorectal cancer screening among american Indian women older than 50 years in the midwest.J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Jul 1;4(3):160-6. doi: 10.1177/2150131912457574. Epub 2012 Aug 14. J Prim Care Community Health. 2013. PMID: 23799701 Free PMC article.
-
Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review.Eur J Public Health. 2016 Feb;26(1):158-68. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv148. Epub 2015 Sep 14. Eur J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26370437 Review.
Cited by
-
Colorectal cancer screening participation in First Nations populations worldwide: a systematic review and data synthesis.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 May 25;73:102666. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102666. eCollection 2024 Jul. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38828132 Free PMC article.
-
Mammogram perceptions, communication, and gaps in care among individuals with non-English language preference in Oregon and Washington states.Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jul 28;35:102352. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102352. eCollection 2023 Oct. Prev Med Rep. 2023. PMID: 37593353 Free PMC article.
-
Native American Perspectives on Health and Traditional Ecological Knowledge.Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Dec;126(12):125002. doi: 10.1289/EHP1944. Environ Health Perspect. 2018. PMID: 30675814 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 15. Patient Educ Couns. 2013. PMID: 23419327 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71–96. - PubMed
-
- Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999 Jan-Feb;49(1):8–31. 31. - PubMed
-
- Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Oct 1;89(19):1406–1422. - PubMed
-
- U S. Preventive Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129–131. - PubMed
-
- Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997 Feb;112(2):594–642. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
