A psychometric evaluation of an English version of the Utrecht Coping List

Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012 Jul;20(4):339-42. doi: 10.1002/erv.2173. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

Abstract

Introduction and aims: Although coping styles in individuals with eating disorders have received increased research interest in recent years, there remains a lack of brief, self-report measures that can reliably measure coping. This study developed an English version of the Utrecht Coping List (UCL) and evaluated its psychometric properties in a UK population.

Method: This was a cross-sectional study. Three hundred and fifteen participants completed the UCL and the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced scale (Carver, Scheier & Weintraub, 1989). Of these, 124 completed the UCL again 6 weeks later.

Results: The UCL demonstrated strong internal consistency. Five of the seven subscales had good test-retest reliability. With the exception of the expression of emotion subscale in men, concurrent validity with the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced subscales was good.

Discussion: Although its use with men requires further investigation, this translated version of the UCL represents a reliable and valid measure of coping in women.

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychological Tests* / standards
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sex Factors
  • Translating
  • United Kingdom
  • Young Adult