Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcome
- PMID: 22433335
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318249a1d7
Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcome
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the time from the diagnosis of uterine rupture to delivery that would prevent adverse neonatal sequelae.
Methods: Cases of uterine rupture from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2009, were identified in nine hospitals in the Intermountain Health Care system and at the University of Utah. Maternal demographics, labor characteristics, and neonatal outcomes were obtained. Primary adverse outcome was abnormal umbilical artery pH level less than 7.0 or 5-minute Apgar score less than 7. Adverse secondary outcome included fetal or neonatal death and neonatal neurologic injury attributed to uterine rupture.
Results: Thirty-six cases of uterine rupture occurred during 11,195 trials of labor after cesarean delivery. Signs of uterine rupture were fetal (n=24), maternal (n=8), or a combination of maternal and fetal (n=3). In one case, uterine rupture was not suspected. Mean time to delivery from the onset of symptoms or signs for the primary adverse outcome group (n=13) was 23.3 (±10.8) minutes compared with 16.0 (±7.7) minutes for those without an adverse outcome (P=.02). No neonate delivered in fewer than 18 minutes had an umbilical pH level below 7.0. Three neonates delivered at more than 30 minutes met criteria for an adverse secondary outcome.
Conclusion: The frequency of uterine rupture was 0.32% in patients attempting a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Neonates delivered within 18 minutes after a suspected uterine rupture had normal umbilical pH levels or 5-minute Apgar scores greater than 7. Poor long-term outcome occurred in three neonates with a decision-to-delivery time longer than 30 minutes.
Level of evidence: II.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):903-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117361. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. PMID: 11641675
-
The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;192(1):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.034. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15672028
-
Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040405. Epub 2004 Dec 14. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15598960
-
Birth after previous cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes.Semin Perinatol. 2010 Aug;34(4):249-57. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.004. Semin Perinatol. 2010. PMID: 20654775 Review.
-
Uterine rupture associated with VBAC.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;55(4):978-87. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31826fd9b0. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 23090467 Review.
Cited by
-
Uterine Rupture: A Case Series From a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India.Cureus. 2023 Oct 21;15(10):e47446. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47446. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38021804 Free PMC article.
-
Neonatal outcomes associated with time from a high fetal blood lactate concentration to operative delivery.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Aug;102(8):1106-1114. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14597. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023. PMID: 37287317 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study.CMAJ. 2023 Feb 6;195(5):E178-E186. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.220928. CMAJ. 2023. PMID: 36746486 Free PMC article.
-
Successful vaginal delivery and maternal and perinatal outcomes in patients with a history of cesarean section and labor trial: cross-sectional study.Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2022 Dec 30;73(4):369-377. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3874. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2022. PMID: 36637385 Free PMC article. English, Spanish.
-
Epidemiology of uterine rupture among pregnant women in China and development of a risk prediction model: analysis of data from a multicentre, cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):e054540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054540. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34845076 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
