Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis
- PMID: 22443478
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202277
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis
Erratum in
- N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):881
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is the recommended therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are not suitable candidates for surgery. The outcomes beyond 1 year in such patients are not known.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients to transfemoral TAVR or to standard therapy (which often included balloon aortic valvuloplasty). Data on 2-year outcomes were analyzed.
Results: A total of 358 patients underwent randomization at 21 centers. The rates of death at 2 years were 43.3% in the TAVR group and 68.0% in the standard-therapy group (P<0.001), and the corresponding rates of cardiac death were 31.0% and 62.4% (P<0.001). The survival advantage associated with TAVR that was seen at 1 year remained significant among patients who survived beyond the first year (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.92; P=0.02 with the use of the log-rank test). The rate of stroke was higher after TAVR than with standard therapy (13.8% vs. 5.5%, P=0.01), owing, in the first 30 days, to the occurrence of more ischemic events in the TAVR group (6.7% vs. 1.7%, P=0.02) and, beyond 30 days, to the occurrence of more hemorrhagic strokes in the TAVR group (2.2% vs. 0.6%, P=0.16). At 2 years, the rate of rehospitalization was 35.0% in the TAVR group and 72.5% in the standard-therapy group (P<0.001). TAVR, as compared with standard therapy, was also associated with improved functional status (P<0.001). The data suggest that the mortality benefit after TAVR may be limited to patients who do not have extensive coexisting conditions. Echocardiographic analysis showed a sustained increase in aortic-valve area and a decrease in aortic-valve gradient, with no worsening of paravalvular aortic regurgitation.
Conclusions: Among appropriately selected patients with severe aortic stenosis who were not suitable candidates for surgery, TAVR reduced the rates of death and hospitalization, with a decrease in symptoms and an improvement in valve hemodynamics that were sustained at 2 years of follow-up. The presence of extensive coexisting conditions may attenuate the survival benefit of TAVR. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00530894.).
Comment in
-
Valvular disease: TAVR outcomes maintained 2-years after the PARTNER trial.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;9(6):314. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.56. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22488486 No abstract available.
-
BMJ shortlisted trial of Edwards-SAPIEN valve does not include all randomised patients.BMJ. 2013 May 22;346:f3229. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3229. BMJ. 2013. PMID: 23697774 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement.N Engl J Med. 2012 May 3;366(18):1686-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200384. Epub 2012 Mar 26. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID: 22443479 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes with post-dilation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER I trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valve).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jul;7(7):781-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.013. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 25060022
-
Long-term outcomes of inoperable patients with aortic stenosis randomly assigned to transcatheter aortic valve replacement or standard therapy.Circulation. 2014 Oct 21;130(17):1483-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009834. Epub 2014 Sep 9. Circulation. 2014. PMID: 25205802 Clinical Trial.
-
Valvular performance and aortic regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement using Edwards valve versus CoreValve for severe aortic stenosis: A Meta-analysis.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Jun;17(4):248-55. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Feb 19. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016. PMID: 26948087 Review.
-
What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):837-43. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv037. Epub 2015 Mar 8. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25754372 Review.
Cited by
-
Differences in TAVR Utilization in Aortic Stenosis Among Patients With and Without Psychiatric Comorbidities.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Aug 13;3(9):102235. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102235. eCollection 2024 Sep. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024. PMID: 39575218 Free PMC article.
-
A Novel Protocol for Contrast-Free Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Evaluation and Implantation.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Aug 14;3(9):102237. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102237. eCollection 2024 Sep. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024. PMID: 39575213 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable biosprosthesis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Sep;20(3):311-318. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.142240. Epub 2024 Aug 13. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024. PMID: 39464586 Free PMC article.
-
Multiomics identification of ALDH9A1 as a crucial immunoregulatory molecule involved in calcific aortic valve disease.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23577. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75115-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39384885 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Japanese Patients With Large Annulus: The OCEAN-TAVI Registry.JACC Asia. 2024 Aug 13;4(9):686-694. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.07.002. eCollection 2024 Sep. JACC Asia. 2024. PMID: 39371621 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources