Shifts in national rates of inpatient prolapse surgery emphasize current coding inadequacies
- PMID: 22453854
- PMCID: PMC4353384
- DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182254cf1
Shifts in national rates of inpatient prolapse surgery emphasize current coding inadequacies
Abstract
Objective: : This study aimed to assess national rates, types, and routes of inpatient surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States in 1998 compared to those in 2007.
Methods: : We used the 1998 and 2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which represents a stratified, random sample of discharge data from US hospitals. We included women 20 years and older who underwent surgery for prolapse based on diagnosis and procedure codes of the International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification. We calculated the number of women undergoing surgery each year and incidence rates.
Results: : The total number of women undergoing prolapse surgeries was 92,503 in 1998 versus 113,646 in 2007. The incidence rate of surgery increased slightly, from 90.8 to 100.9 per 100,000 women, respectively. The most common procedure was hysterectomy, representing approximately half of prolapse surgeries in 1998 and 2007. Suspension procedures accounted for 18.8% of procedures in 2007, an increase from 6.1% in 1998. Surgeries performed via a minimally invasive route increased from 4.8% in 1998 to 9.4% in 2007. However, it was difficult to determine the route for many procedures based on current ICD-9 codes. There were also no codes that specifically designated mesh kit procedures or minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies.
Conclusions: : During the last decade, the rate of inpatient prolapse surgery has slightly increased. The proportion of suspension procedures has increased; however, it is difficult to determine the route of these procedures based on current ICD-9 codes. These findings emphasize that ICD-9 procedure codes have not kept up with changes in clinical practice.
Similar articles
-
Trends in management of pelvic organ prolapse among female Medicare beneficiaries.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;212(4):463.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.025. Epub 2014 Oct 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25446663 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):268.e1-268.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 May 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32413430
-
Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):552.e1-552.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Aug 23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34437864
-
Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Single Technology Assessment of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. PMID: 29553663 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 30;11:CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub6. PMID: 23633316 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Identification of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR) Cutoff Scores for Impaired Sexual Function in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders.J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):13. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010013. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31861568 Free PMC article.
-
Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):265.e1-265.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1094. Epub 2018 Nov 22. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30471259 Free PMC article.
-
Cumulative Incidence of a Subsequent Surgery After Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Procedure.Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):1124-1130. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002051. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28486368 Free PMC article.
-
Concomitant apical suspensory procedures in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse in the United States in 2011.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Apr;27(4):613-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2894-3. Epub 2015 Dec 2. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 26630948
-
Pelvic organ prolapse surgical management in Portugal and FDA safety communication have an impact on vaginal mesh.Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jan;26(1):113-22. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2480-0. Epub 2014 Aug 16. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 25124092
References
-
- Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, et al. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(2 Pt 1):299–305. - PubMed
-
- Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–506. - PubMed
-
- Subak LL, Waejten LE, van den Eeden S, et al. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(4):646–651. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
