Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;53(5):801-8.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs044. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

Stress-induced Chromatin Changes: A Critical View on Their Heritability

Free PMC article

Stress-induced Chromatin Changes: A Critical View on Their Heritability

Ales Pecinka et al. Plant Cell Physiol. .
Free PMC article


The investigation of stress responses has been a focus of plant research, breeding and biotechnology for a long time. Insight into stress perception, signaling and genetic determinants of resistance has recently been complemented by growing evidence for substantial stress-induced changes at the chromatin level. These affect specific sequences or occur genome-wide and are often correlated with transcriptional regulation. The majority of these changes only occur during stress exposure, and both expression and chromatin states typically revert to the pre-stress state shortly thereafter. Other changes result in the maintenance of new chromatin states and modified gene expression for a longer time after stress exposure, preparing an individual for developmental decisions or more effective defence. Beyond this, there are claims for stress-induced heritable chromatin modifications that are transmitted to progeny, thereby improving their characteristics. These effects resemble the concept of Lamarckian inheritance of acquired characters and represent a challenge to the uniqueness of DNA sequence-based inheritance. However, with the growing insight into epigenetic regulation and transmission of chromatin states, it is worth investigating these phenomena carefully. While genetic changes (mainly transposon mobility) in response to stress-induced interference with chromatin are well documented and heritable, in our view there is no unambiguous evidence for transmission of exclusively chromatin-controlled stress effects to progeny. We propose a set of criteria that should be applied to substantiate the data for stress-induced, chromatin-encoded new traits. Well-controlled stress treatments, thorough phenotyping and application of refined genome-wide epigenetic analysis tools should be helpful in moving from interesting observations towards robust evidence.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 57 articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. Adrian J, Torti S, Turck F. From decision to commitment: the molecular memory of flowering. Mol. Plant. 2009;2:628–642. - PubMed
    1. Ahuja I, de Vos RCH, Bones AM, Hall RD. Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:664–674. - PubMed
    1. Becker C, Hagmann J, Mueller J, Koenig D, Stegle O, Borgwardt K, et al. Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nature. 2011;480:245–249. - PubMed
    1. Bilichak A, Ilnystkyy Y, Hollunder J, Kovalchuk I. The progeny of Arabidopsis thaliana plants exposed to salt exhibit changes in DNA methylation, histone modifications and gene expression. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30515. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyko A, Kovalchuk I. Genome instability and epigenetic modification—heritable responses to environmental stress? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011;14:260–266. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms