An actuarial analysis shows that offering lung cancer screening as an insurance benefit would save lives at relatively low cost
- PMID: 22492894
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0814
An actuarial analysis shows that offering lung cancer screening as an insurance benefit would save lives at relatively low cost
Abstract
Lung cancer screening is not established as a public health practice, yet the results of a recent large randomized controlled trial showed that screening with low-dose spiral computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality. Using actuarial models, this study estimated the costs and benefits of annual lung cancer screening offered as a commercial insurance benefit in the high-risk US population ages 50-64. Assuming current commercial reimbursement rates for treatment, we found that screening would cost about $1 per insured member per month in 2012 dollars. The cost per life-year saved would be below $19,000, an amount that compares favorably with screening for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers. Our results suggest that commercial insurers should consider lung cancer screening of high-risk individuals to be high-value coverage and provide it as a benefit to people who are at least fifty years old and have a smoking history of thirty pack-years or more. We also believe that payers and patients should demand screening from high-quality, low-cost providers, thus helping set an example of efficient system innovation.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.Lung Cancer. 2005 May;48(2):171-85. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Jan 4. Lung Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15829317
-
Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.Acta Oncol. 1997;36 Suppl 9:1-60. Acta Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9143316
-
Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):456-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1308936. Epub 2012 Apr 24. Endoscopy. 2012. PMID: 22531982
-
Colorectal cancer screening: health impact and cost effectiveness.Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jul;31(1):80-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.009. Am J Prev Med. 2006. PMID: 16777546 Review.
-
Screening of colorectal cancer.Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2005 Oct;14(4):699-722. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2005.05.009. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2005. PMID: 16226687 Review.
Cited by
-
Current Evidence for a Lung Cancer Screening Program.Port J Public Health. 2024 Apr 22;42(2):133-158. doi: 10.1159/000538434. eCollection 2024 Aug. Port J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39469231 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inadequate Uptake of USPSTF-Recommended Low Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening.J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241235011. doi: 10.1177/21501319241235011. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024. PMID: 38400557 Free PMC article.
-
See Lung Cancer with an AI.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 19;15(4):1321. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041321. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36831662 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Population-Based Screening Using Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations.Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Apr;41(4):395-411. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01238-3. Epub 2023 Jan 20. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023. PMID: 36670332 Free PMC article.
-
EarlyCDT Lung blood test for risk classification of solid pulmonary nodules: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(49):1-184. doi: 10.3310/IJFM4802. Health Technol Assess. 2022. PMID: 36534989 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
