Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies
- PMID: 22493463
- PMCID: PMC3360917
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies
Abstract
Background: Despite evidence that several colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategies can reduce CRC mortality, screening rates remain low. This study aimed to determine whether the approach by which screening is recommended influences adherence.
Methods: We used a cluster randomization design with clinic time block as the unit of randomization. Persons at average risk for development of CRC in a racially/ethnically diverse urban setting were randomized to receive recommendation for screening by fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), colonoscopy, or their choice of FOBT or colonoscopy. The primary outcome was completion of CRC screening within 12 months after enrollment, defined as performance of colonoscopy, or 3 FOBT cards plus colonoscopy for any positive FOBT result. Secondary analyses evaluated sociodemographic factors associated with completion of screening.
Results: A total of 997 participants were enrolled; 58% completed the CRC screening strategy they were assigned or chose. However, participants who were recommended colonoscopy completed screening at a significantly lower rate (38%) than participants who were recommended FOBT (67%) (P < .001) or given a choice between FOBT or colonoscopy (69%) (P < .001). Latinos and Asians (primarily Chinese) completed screening more often than African Americans. Moreover, nonwhite participants adhered more often to FOBT, while white participants adhered more often to colonoscopy.
Conclusions: The common practice of universally recommending colonoscopy may reduce adherence to CRC screening, especially among racial/ethnic minorities. Significant variation in overall and strategy-specific adherence exists between racial/ethnic groups; however, this may be a proxy for health beliefs and/or language. These results suggest that patient preferences should be considered when making CRC screening recommendations. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00705731.
Figures
Comment in
-
The importance of choosing colorectal cancer screening tests: comment on "Adherence to colorectal cancer screening".Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 9;172(7):582-3. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.349. Arch Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22493464 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Adherence to Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening Over 3 Years.Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;111(1):105-14. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.367. Epub 2015 Nov 3. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 26526080 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Persistent racial and ethnic disparities in up-to-date colorectal cancer testing in medicare enrollees.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Mar;57(3):412-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02143.x. Epub 2009 Jan 16. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009. PMID: 19175435
-
Is the patient activation measure associated with adherence to colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test result?Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Dec 21;7(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0270-8. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018. PMID: 30577883 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Colorectal cancer screening.J Intern Med. 2011 Aug;270(2):87-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02399.x. Epub 2011 Jun 9. J Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21575082 Review.
-
Options for screening for colorectal cancer.Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2003;(237):13-6. doi: 10.1080/00855910310001421. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2003. PMID: 12797674 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Colorectal Polyps Based on Electronic Health Records.Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 27;12(9):1955. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12091955. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 39335469 Free PMC article.
-
The Development of a Digital Patient Navigation Tool to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients: Acceptability and Usability Testing.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 25;8:e53224. doi: 10.2196/53224. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39321451 Free PMC article.
-
Algorithm Development and Early Performance Evaluation of a Next-Generation Multitarget Stool DNA Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer.Gastro Hep Adv. 2024 May 17;3(6):740-748. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.05.002. eCollection 2024. Gastro Hep Adv. 2024. PMID: 39280922 Free PMC article.
-
Innovations in Early Lung Cancer Detection: Tracing the Evolution and Advancements in Screening.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):4911. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164911. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39201053 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adherence to Recommendations for Repeat Surveillance After Publication of New Postpolypectomy Guidelines.Gastro Hep Adv. 2022 Jul 31;2(1):132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2022.07.014. eCollection 2023. Gastro Hep Adv. 2022. PMID: 39130145 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wilson JMG, Jungner F. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1968.
-
- Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1472–1477. - PubMed
-
- Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jørgensen OD, Søndergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1467–1471. - PubMed
-
- Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood: Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(19):1365–1371. - PubMed
-
- Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(22):1603–1607. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical

