When solving 22-7 is much more difficult than 99-12

Neurocase. 2013;19(1):54-66. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2011.654216. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

Abstract

We describe the case of a 69-year-old professor of mathematics (GV) who was examined 2 years after left-hemispheric capsular-thalamic haemorrhage. GV showed disproportionate impairment in subtractions requiring borrowing (22 - 7). For large subtraction problems without borrowing (99 - 12) performance was almost flawless. Subtractions with borrowing mostly relied on inadequate attempts to invert subtractions into the corresponding additions (22 - 7 = x as 7 + x = 22). The hypothesis is advanced that difficulty in the inhibitory components of attention tasks (Stroop test, go-no-go task) might be the responsible factor of his calculation impairment. A deficit in subtractions with borrowing might be related to left-hemispheric damage involving thalamo-cortical connections.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Attention / physiology
  • Brain / pathology
  • Cognition / physiology
  • Executive Function
  • Functional Laterality / physiology
  • Humans
  • Intracranial Hemorrhages / psychology*
  • Male
  • Mathematics*
  • Memory / physiology
  • Mental Processes / physiology
  • Problem Solving
  • Psychomotor Performance / physiology
  • Reaction Time / physiology
  • Stroop Test
  • Thalamic Diseases / psychology*