Association of treatment with losartan vs candesartan and mortality among patients with heart failure
- PMID: 22496265
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.452
Association of treatment with losartan vs candesartan and mortality among patients with heart failure
Abstract
Context: The benefit of angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) in heart failure is thought to be a class effect, but no head-to-head randomized trials have compared individual ARBs. Results from observational studies suggest that losartan may be associated with increased mortality in patients with heart failure compared with other ARBs.
Objective: To assess the hypothesis that losartan use is associated with increased all-cause mortality in heart failure patients as compared with candesartan.
Design, setting, and participants: We conducted a nationwide Danish registry-based cohort study, linking individual-level information on hospital contacts, filled prescriptions, and potential confounders. Patients aged 45 years and older with first-time hospitalization for heart failure in 1998-2008 were identified from the Danish National Patient Registry. New users of losartan and candesartan were selected for inclusion in the study cohort.
Main outcome measures: We used Cox proportional hazards regression to compare the risk of all-cause mortality in users of losartan and candesartan.
Results: Among 4397 users of losartan, 1212 deaths occurred during 11,347 person-years of follow-up (unadjusted incidence rate [IR]/100 person-years, 10.7; 95% CI, 10.1-11.3) compared with 330 deaths during 3675 person-years among 2082 users of candesartan (unadjusted IR/100 person-years, 9.0; 95% CI, 8.1-10.0). Compared with candesartan, losartan was not associated with increased all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96-1.25) or cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.96-1.36). Compared with high doses of candesartan (16-32 mg), low-dose (12.5 mg) and medium-dose losartan (50 mg) were associated with increased mortality (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 2.19-3.55 and HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11-1.73, respectively); use of high-dose losartan (100 mg) was similar in risk (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.00).
Conclusions: Among patients with heart failure, overall use of losartan compared with candesartan was not associated with an increased mortality risk. Although low doses of losartan were associated with increased mortality, there was no increased mortality comparing high-dose losartan against the highest doses of candesartan.
Comment in
-
Losartan vs candesartan for heart failure.JAMA. 2012 Jul 25;308(4):336; author reply 336-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7642. JAMA. 2012. PMID: 22820775 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Association of candesartan vs losartan with all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure.JAMA. 2011 Jan 12;305(2):175-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1949. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21224459
-
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and heart failure: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors remain the first-line option.Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):180-6. Prescrire Int. 2005. PMID: 16285075
-
Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of heart failure: a class effect?Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Apr;27(4):526-34. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.4.526. Pharmacotherapy. 2007. PMID: 17381379
-
Comparative clinical- and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis.Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Mar;65(3):253-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02633.x. Epub 2011 Feb 1. Int J Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 21284790 Review.
-
[Pharmocological therapeutics for chronic heart failure--how to use ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker].Nihon Rinsho. 2007 May 28;65 Suppl 5:84-9. Nihon Rinsho. 2007. PMID: 17571370 Review. Japanese. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Aldosterone breakthrough from a pharmacological perspective.Hypertens Res. 2022 Jun;45(6):967-975. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-00913-4. Epub 2022 Apr 14. Hypertens Res. 2022. PMID: 35422512 Review.
-
Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Blockers in Heart Failure.Curr Drug Targets. 2020;21(2):125-131. doi: 10.2174/1389450120666190821152000. Curr Drug Targets. 2020. PMID: 31433752 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The place of ARBs in heart failure therapy: is aldosterone suppression the key?Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;13:1753944719868134. doi: 10.1177/1753944719868134. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2019. PMID: 31401939 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Machine Learning Methods Improve Prognostication, Identify Clinically Distinct Phenotypes, and Detect Heterogeneity in Response to Therapy in a Large Cohort of Heart Failure Patients.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 12;7(8):e008081. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008081. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29650709 Free PMC article.
-
Angiotensin receptor blocker drugs and inhibition of adrenal beta-arrestin-1-dependent aldosterone production: Implications for heart failure therapy.World J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 26;9(3):200-206. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.200. World J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28400916 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
