Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in Japanese elderly, high-risk, hypertensive patients
- PMID: 22503610
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.010
Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in Japanese elderly, high-risk, hypertensive patients
Abstract
Background: It is unknown whether high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy or angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker combination therapy is better in elderly hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of these treatments in elderly, high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients.
Methods: The OlmeSartan and Calcium Antagonists Randomized (OSCAR) study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point study of 1164 hypertensive patients aged 65 to 84 years with type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension during treatment with olmesartan 20 mg/d were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg/d olmesartan (high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker) or a calcium channel blocker + 20 mg/d olmesartan (angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker). The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular events and noncardiovascular death.
Results: During a 3-year follow-up, blood pressure was significantly lower in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group than in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group. Mean blood pressure at 36 months was 135.0/74.3 mm Hg in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group and 132.6/72.6 mm Hg in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group. More primary end points occurred in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group than in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group (58 vs 48 events, hazard ratio [HR], 1.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.92; P=.17). In patients with cardiovascular disease at baseline, more primary events occurred in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group (HR, 1.63, P=.03); in contrast, fewer events were observed in the subgroup without cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.52, P=.14). This treatment-by-subgroup interaction was significant (P=.02).
Conclusion: The angiotensin II receptor blocker and calcium channel blocker combination lowered blood pressure more than the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker and reduced the incidence of primary end points more than the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker in patients with cardiovascular disease. The addition of a second antihypertensive agent is more effective at lowering blood pressure than simply doubling the dose of an existing agent.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00134160.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Hypertension in older adults: progress and limitations.Am J Med. 2012 Oct;125(10):949-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Aug 14. Am J Med. 2012. PMID: 22902034 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Rationale, design and patient baseline characteristics of OlmeSartan and calcium antagonists randomized (OSCAR) study: a study comparing the incidence of cardiovascular events between high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy and combination therapy of ARB with calcium channel blocker in Japanese elderly high-risk hypertensive patients (ClinicalTrials. gov no. NCT00134160).Hypertens Res. 2009 Jul;32(7):575-80. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.60. Epub 2009 May 15. Hypertens Res. 2009. PMID: 19444280 Clinical Trial.
-
Additive antioxidative effects of azelnidipine on angiotensin receptor blocker olmesartan treatment for type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria.Hypertens Res. 2011 Aug;34(8):935-41. doi: 10.1038/hr.2011.67. Epub 2011 Jun 9. Hypertens Res. 2011. PMID: 21654755 Clinical Trial.
-
Combined effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker and either a calcium channel blocker or diuretic on day-by-day variability of home blood pressure: the Japan Combined Treatment With Olmesartan and a Calcium-Channel Blocker Versus Olmesartan and Diuretics Randomized Efficacy Study.Hypertension. 2012 Jun;59(6):1132-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.189217. Epub 2012 Apr 30. Hypertension. 2012. PMID: 22547439 Clinical Trial.
-
Olmesartan/Amlodipine: combination therapy for the treatment of hypertension [corrected].Adv Ther. 2009 Jan;26(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12325-008-0132-9. Epub 2009 Jan 7. Adv Ther. 2009. PMID: 19129998 Review.
-
Olmesartan/amlodipine: blood pressure lowering and beyond in special populations.Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Feb;6(1):31-44. doi: 10.1177/1753944711432902. Epub 2012 Jan 5. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2012. PMID: 22222315 Review.
Cited by
-
The Polypill: A New Alternative in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease.J Clin Med. 2024 May 29;13(11):3179. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113179. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892892 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil‑amlodipine besylate tablets (Sevikar®) in older patients with essential hypertension: Subgroup analysis from the Sevikar study.Exp Ther Med. 2023 Dec 5;27(2):51. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12338. eCollection 2024 Feb. Exp Ther Med. 2023. PMID: 38234624 Free PMC article.
-
Polypill Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Combination Medication Therapy for Hypertension Management.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 22;12(23):7226. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237226. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38068278 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical studies on pharmacological treatment of hypertension in Japan.J Hum Hypertens. 2024 Jun;38(6):486-499. doi: 10.1038/s41371-021-00533-4. Epub 2021 May 7. J Hum Hypertens. 2024. PMID: 33963269 Review.
-
Methods of Blood Pressure Assessment Used in Milestone Hypertension Trials.Pulse (Basel). 2018 Jul;6(1-2):112-123. doi: 10.1159/000489855. Epub 2018 Jul 18. Pulse (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30283753 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
