Background/aims: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with standard triple regimens are worsening, and alternative treatments are urgently needed in some populations. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of bismuth-based quadruple and concomitant regimens.
Methods: Consecutive Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomized to receive one of two regimens: (i) bismuth subsalicylate 300 mg q.i.d., esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d., tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. (bismuth group) or (ii) esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d., tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. (concomitant group) for 14 days. Gastroscopy and 14C-urea breath test were performed before enrollment, and urea breath test was repeated six weeks after the treatment.
Results: A total of 200 patients were randomized, and 180 of them completed the protocols. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were 79% (95% confidence interval 71-87) and 89.7% (95% confidence interval 83-95) in the bismuth group and 74% (95% confidence interval 68-81) and 80.4% (95% confidence interval 72-87) in the concomitant group. The bismuth regimen achieved a slightly better eradication rate compared to the concomitant group in both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, but results were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Ten patients (6 in bismuth, 4 in concomitant groups) dropped out of the study because of side effects.
Conclusions: The quadruple regimens with or without bismuth achieved moderate eradication rates as a first-line eradication option of Helicobacter pylori in our population, in which a bismuth-based regimen seems more appropriate. The compliance and side effects are important issues affecting the success of these regimens.