Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States
- PMID: 22513427
- DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249ce5a
Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States
Abstract
Background: Fewer than 10% of patients with colon cancer in the United States are reportedly treated with a laparoscopic colectomy despite the benefits it has over the open approach. This estimate, however, may be artificially low because of inaccurate case identification.
Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically for the treatment of colon cancer and to identify factors associated with its use.
Design: This study is a retrospective review of the 2008 to 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. SETTINGS, PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS: Adult patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer who underwent an elective colectomy were included.
Main outcome measures: The overall proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically was calculated. Multivariable regression modeling was used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with undergoing a laparoscopic procedure.
Results: During the study period, 9075 (weighted = 45,549) patients were identified with 50% treated via the laparoscopic approach. Patients were more likely to undergo a laparoscopic procedure if their median annual income was $63,000+ based on home zip code (adjusted relative risk = 1.08 (1.02-1.16)) and less likely if they were 70+ years of age (adjusted relative risk = 0.93 (0.87-1.00)), female (adjusted relative risk = 0.96 (0.92-0.99)), and had Medicaid (adjusted relative risk =0.84 (0.73-0.97)), or 3+ chronic conditions (adjusted relative risk = 0.84 (0.79-0.89)). Treatment at teaching hospitals (adjusted relative risk =1.10 (1.00-1.20)) and high-volume centers (adjusted relative risk =1.41 (1.22-1.63)) was associated with undergoing a laparoscopic colectomy, whereas treatment at rural hospitals was associated with less frequent use of laparoscopic colectomy (adjusted relative risk = 0.76 (0.64-0.90)).
Limitations: This study is subject to the limitations of using administrative data.
Conclusions: There has been widespread adoption of the laparoscopic approach to colon resection for cancer in the United States. Disparities in access remain, with application of this technique favoring patients with a higher socioeconomic status and those able to be treated at higher-volume, academic, and nonrural centers.
Comment in
-
Laparoscopy…for all?Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 May;55(5):499-500. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249d993. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012. PMID: 22513426 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Hospital readmissions and emergency department visits following laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer.Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Sep;56(9):1053-61. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318293eabc. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013. PMID: 23929014
-
Impact of surgeon and hospital caseload on the likelihood of performing laparoscopic vs open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: a study based on 55,949 patients.Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):253-9; discussion 259. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.253. Arch Surg. 2007. PMID: 17372050
-
Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States.Arch Surg. 2008 Sep;143(9):832-9; discussion 839-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.9.832. Arch Surg. 2008. PMID: 18794419
-
Laparoscopic colectomy in colon cancer. A single-center clinical experience.G Chir. 2007 Apr;28(4):126-33. G Chir. 2007. PMID: 17475112 Review.
-
Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):431-38. Minerva Chir. 2003. PMID: 14603155 Review.
Cited by
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colon Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes-A Focus on Studies from 2020-2024.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;16(8):1552. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081552. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38672635 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for colon cancer surgery: a propensity-score matching analysis of multicenter cohorts.J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2911-2917. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01727-3. Epub 2023 Oct 11. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 37821761
-
What Should We Recommend for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults Aged 75 and Older?Curr Oncol. 2021 Jul 9;28(4):2540-2547. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28040231. Curr Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34287279 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6227-6243. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08123-0. Epub 2020 Nov 18. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 33206242 Free PMC article.
-
Acquiring Advanced Laparoscopic Colectomy Skills - The Issues.Malays J Med Sci. 2020 Oct;27(5):24-35. doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.5.3. Epub 2020 Oct 27. Malays J Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 33154699 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
