Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;55(5):501-8.
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249ce5a.

Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States

Affiliations

Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States

Justin Fox et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: Fewer than 10% of patients with colon cancer in the United States are reportedly treated with a laparoscopic colectomy despite the benefits it has over the open approach. This estimate, however, may be artificially low because of inaccurate case identification.

Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically for the treatment of colon cancer and to identify factors associated with its use.

Design: This study is a retrospective review of the 2008 to 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. SETTINGS, PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS: Adult patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer who underwent an elective colectomy were included.

Main outcome measures: The overall proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically was calculated. Multivariable regression modeling was used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with undergoing a laparoscopic procedure.

Results: During the study period, 9075 (weighted = 45,549) patients were identified with 50% treated via the laparoscopic approach. Patients were more likely to undergo a laparoscopic procedure if their median annual income was $63,000+ based on home zip code (adjusted relative risk = 1.08 (1.02-1.16)) and less likely if they were 70+ years of age (adjusted relative risk = 0.93 (0.87-1.00)), female (adjusted relative risk = 0.96 (0.92-0.99)), and had Medicaid (adjusted relative risk =0.84 (0.73-0.97)), or 3+ chronic conditions (adjusted relative risk = 0.84 (0.79-0.89)). Treatment at teaching hospitals (adjusted relative risk =1.10 (1.00-1.20)) and high-volume centers (adjusted relative risk =1.41 (1.22-1.63)) was associated with undergoing a laparoscopic colectomy, whereas treatment at rural hospitals was associated with less frequent use of laparoscopic colectomy (adjusted relative risk = 0.76 (0.64-0.90)).

Limitations: This study is subject to the limitations of using administrative data.

Conclusions: There has been widespread adoption of the laparoscopic approach to colon resection for cancer in the United States. Disparities in access remain, with application of this technique favoring patients with a higher socioeconomic status and those able to be treated at higher-volume, academic, and nonrural centers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Laparoscopy…for all?
    Etzioni DA. Etzioni DA. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 May;55(5):499-500. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249d993. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012. PMID: 22513426 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources