Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;47(6):2250-72.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01412.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

Chronic illness and patient satisfaction

Affiliations

Chronic illness and patient satisfaction

Caroline S Carlin et al. Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To examine how the relationship between patient characteristics, patient experience with the health care system, and overall satisfaction with care varies with illness complexity.

Data sources/study setting: Telephone survey in 14 U.S. geographical areas.

Study design: Structural equation modeling was used to examine how relationships among patient characteristics, three constructs representing patient experience with the health care system, and overall satisfaction with care vary across patients by number of chronic illnesses.

Data collection/extraction methods: Random digital dial telephone survey of adults with one or more chronic illnesses.

Principal findings: Patients with more chronic illnesses report higher overall satisfaction. The total effects of better patient-provider interaction and support for patient self-management are associated with higher satisfaction for all levels of chronic illness. The latter effect increases with illness burden. Older, female, or insured patients are more satisfied; highly educated patients are less satisfied.

Conclusions: Providers seeking to improve their patient satisfaction scores could do so by considering patient characteristics when accepting new patients or deciding who to refer to other providers for treatment. However, our findings suggest constructive actions that providers can take to improve their patient satisfaction scores without selection on patient characteristics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual Framework Note. Latent endogenous characteristics are measured through survey questions detailed in Table 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of Latent Variable Interactions Showing Unstandardized Path Coefficients Note. Bolded parameters indicate individual p-value < 0.5. Parameters are statistically significantly different across complexity levels in the direct effects from understanding of condition and treatment options to overall satisfaction and from support for self-management of illness to overall satisfaction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aspinal F, Addington-Hall J, Hughes R, Higgison IJ. “Using Satisfaction to Measure the Quality of Palliative Care: A Review of the Literature”. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2003;42(4):324–39. - PubMed
    1. Baker D, Brown J, Chan K, Dracup K, Keeler E. “A Telephone Survey to Measure Communication, Education, Self-Management, and Health Status for Patients with Heart Failure: The Improving Chronic Illness Care Evaluation (ICICE)”. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2005;11(1):36–42. - PubMed
    1. Bentler PM. “On Tests and Indices for Evaluating Structural Models”. Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;42(5):825–9.
    1. Boudreaux ED, O'Hea EL. “Patient Satisfaction in the Emergency Department: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Practice”. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2004;26(1):13–26. - PubMed
    1. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. “Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care for Older Patients with Multiple Comorbid Diseases: Implications for Pay for Performance”. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005;294(6):716–24. - PubMed

Publication types