Comparison of metformin and insulin versus insulin alone for type 2 diabetes: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
- PMID: 22517929
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e1771
Comparison of metformin and insulin versus insulin alone for type 2 diabetes: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the benefits and harms of metformin and insulin versus insulin alone as reported in randomised clinical trials of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Design: Systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.
Data sources: The Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature until March 2011. We also searched abstracts presented at the American Diabetes Association and European Association for the Study of Diabetes Congresses, contacted relevant trial authors and pharmaceutical companies, hand searched reference lists of included trials, and searched the US Food and Drug Administration website.
Review methods: Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts for randomised clinical trials comparing metformin and insulin versus insulin alone (with or without placebo) in patients with type 2 diabetes, older than 18 years, and with an intervention period of at least 12 weeks. We included trials irrespective of language, publication status, predefined outcomes, antidiabetic interventions used before randomisation, and reported outcomes.
Results: We included 26 randomised trials with 2286 participants, of which 23 trials with 2117 participants could provide data. All trials had high risk of bias. Data were sparse for outcomes relevant to patients. Metformin and insulin versus insulin alone did not significantly affect all cause mortality (relative risk 1.30, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 2.99) or cardiovascular mortality (1.70, 0.35 to 8.30). Trial sequential analyses showed that more trials were needed before reliable conclusions could be drawn regarding these outcomes. In a fixed effect model, but not in a random effects model, severe hypoglycaemia was significantly more frequent with metformin and insulin than with insulin alone (2.83, 1.17 to 6.86). In a random effects model, metformin and insulin resulted in reduced HbA(1c), weight gain, and insulin dose, compared with insulin alone; trial sequential analyses showed sufficient evidence for a HbA(1c) reduction of 0.5%, lower weight gain of 1 kg, and lower insulin dose of 5 U/day.
Conclusions: There was no evidence or even a trend towards improved all cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality with metformin and insulin, compared with insulin alone in type 2 diabetes. Data were limited by the severe lack of data reported by trials for patient relevant outcomes and by poor bias control.
Similar articles
-
Sulphonylurea monotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD009008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009008.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 29;(7):CD009008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009008.pub3. PMID: 23633364 Updated. Review.
-
Intensive glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.BMJ. 2011 Nov 24;343:d6898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6898. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 22115901 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15099124 Review.
-
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ. 2012 Mar 12;344:e1369. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1369. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22411919
-
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD013498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013498.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33662147 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The preferred surgical choice for intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer: total thyroidectomy or lobectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):5087-5100. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001556. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38967517 Free PMC article.
-
[Injection therapy of diabetes].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Jan;135(Suppl 1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02171-x. Epub 2023 Apr 20. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023. PMID: 37101024 Free PMC article. German.
-
Quality of life, patient satisfaction, and cardiovascular outcomes of the randomised 2 x 3 factorial Copenhagen insulin and Metformin therapy (CIMT) trial - A detailed statistical analysis plan.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Feb 24;33:101095. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101095. eCollection 2023 Jun. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023. PMID: 36923108 Free PMC article.
-
Glycemic control in newly insulin-initiated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective follow-up study at a university hospital in Ethiopia.PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0268639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268639. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35617250 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with or without metformin observed in a national cohort in China.BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Jan 19;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00892-6. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022. PMID: 35045841 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous