Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;50(9):749-56.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182551713.

Effect of early preventive dental visits on subsequent dental treatment and expenditures

Heather Beil  1 , Richard Gary Rozier, John S Preisser, Sally C Stearns, Jessica Y Lee
Affiliations

Effect of early preventive dental visits on subsequent dental treatment and expenditures

Heather Beil et al. Med Care. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Professional organizations recommend a preventive dental visit by 1 year of age. This study compared dental treatment and expenditures for Medicaid children who have a preventive visit before the age of 18 months with those who have a visit at age 18-42 months.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used reimbursement claims for 19,888 children enrolled in North Carolina Medicaid (1999-2006). We compared the number of dental treatment procedures at age 43-72 months for children who had a visit by age 18 months with children who had a visit at ages 18-24, 25-30, 31-36, and 37-42 months using a zero-inflated negative binomial model. The likelihood and amount of expenditures at age 43-72 months were compared by group using a logit and ordinary least squares regression.

Results: Children who had a primary or secondary preventive visit by age 18 months had no difference in subsequent dental outcomes compared with children in older age categories. Among children with existing disease, those who had a tertiary preventive visit by age 18 months had lower rates of subsequent treatment [18-24 mo incidence density ratio (IDR): 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.38; 25-30 mo IDR: 1.21, 95% CI, 1.06-1.39; 37-42 mo IDR: 1.39, 95% CI, 1.22-1.59] and lower treatment expenditures compared with children in older age categories.

Conclusions: In this sample of preventive dental users in Medicaid, we found that children at highest risk of dental disease benefited from a visit before the age of 18 months, but most children could delay their first visit until the age of 3 years without an effect on subsequent dental outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Predicted expenditures per year for dental treatment from 43-72 months of age for children who had any expenditure
Legend: Expenditures were predicted for children with any expenditures based on ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model using a smearing factor assuming heteroskedastic and normal errors.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V, et al. Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat Rep. 2007;11(248) - PubMed
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institute of Health; 2000.
    1. Edelstein B, Douglass C. Dispelling the myth that 50 percent of US schoolchildren have never had a cavity. Public Health Reports. 1995;110:522. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Sullivan D, Tinanoff N. The association of early dental caries patterns with caries incidence in preschool children. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56:81–83. - PubMed
    1. Edelstein BL, Manski RJ, Moeller JE. Child dental expenditures: 1996. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:11–17. - PubMed

Publication types