Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Jan;15(1):88-92.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts093. Epub 2012 Apr 22.

Flavored and nonflavored smokeless tobacco products: rate, pattern of use, and effects

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Flavored and nonflavored smokeless tobacco products: rate, pattern of use, and effects

Andrew J Oliver et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: The initiation and maintenance of tobacco use are influenced by several factors, but of equal and often overlooked importance, until recently, is the palatability of the product. Because of the role that flavor may play in the initiation and maintenance of tobacco use, the Food and Drug Administration has decided to ban the use of flavorings, other than menthol, from cigarettes. To date, little attention has been paid to the impact of flavoring in smokeless tobacco (ST) products.

Methods: This study combined the data from 5 previously completed treatment or switching studies to examine the choice of brand flavor in the course of ST use, from initiation to regular use.

Results: The analyses revealed that a majority of subjects' first and current choice of product was flavored, specifically mint or wintergreen, and that a significant number of ST users switched to a flavored brand after already initiating ST use with a regular nonflavored product. In this population, however, flavored products did not appear to lead to greater dependence or increased exposure to nicotine or carcinogens.

Conclusions: More treatment seeking ST users began by using mint-flavored product and switched to and were current users of mint-flavored products. It is possible that mint products play a role in the initiation and maintenance of ST use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Comparison of first and current product use by flavor (n = 6 missing first smokeless tobacco product).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alpert HR, Koh H, Connolly GN. Free nicotine content and strategic marketing of moist snuff tobacco products in the United States: 2000–2006. Tobacco Control. 2008;17:332–338. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.025247. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State-specific prevalence of cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use among adults—United States, 2009. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. 2010;59:1400–1406. doi: mm5943a2 [pii] - PubMed
    1. Chen C, Isabelle LM, Pickworth WB, Pankow JF. Levels of mint and wintergreen flavorants: Smokeless tobacco products vs. confectionery products. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2010;48:755–763. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2009.12.015. - PubMed
    1. Dip-time: Brands of Smokeless Tobacco. Retrieved from http://dip-time.tripod.com/smokeless/id1.html.
    1. Dip-time: New Dippers Page. Retrieved from http://dip-time.tripod.com/smokeless/id8.html.

Publication types

Substances