Aim: This retrospective study compares the overall survival (OS) of multiple myeloma (MM) patients following treatment at a New Zealand hospital over a period in which novel therapies were available but restricted, almost exclusively, to thalidomide as a second-line therapy.
Methods: Clinical, laboratory and OS data were collected on 361 MM patients who were treated at Christchurch Hospital during 2000-2010. Patients were subdivided according to the clinical criteria used to determine front-line treatment decisions. Older patients (age ≥66, n = 180) generally received standard-dose chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) and formed one group. Younger patients were further subdivided according to whether they received autologous SCT (n = 89), allogeneic SCT (n = 24) or no SCT (n = 68).
Results: Older patients had a significantly shorter OS (P < 0.0001) than younger patients (median OS = 25 vs 78 months) however treated. Analysis of relative survival demonstrated that the increased mortality of older patients was greater than that attributable to normal ageing. Younger patients who received no transplant had a significantly shorter OS (P < 0.0001) than those who received autologous SCT or allogeneic SCT with 5-year survivals of 38%, 70% and 72% respectively. Use of novel therapies was significantly higher in younger than older patients (60% vs 47%, P = 0.011).
Conclusions: The front-line treatment groupings of hospital MM patients had significantly different survivals. The OS of SCT ineligible patients remains poor despite the introduction of thalidomide.
© 2012 The Authors; Internal Medicine Journal © 2012 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.