Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians
- PMID: 22539065
- PMCID: PMC3514996
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2051-3
Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians
Abstract
Background: Rising colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in the last decade are attributable almost entirely to increased colonoscopy use. Little is known about factors driving the increase, but primary care physicians (PCPs) play a central role in CRC screening delivery.
Objective: Explore PCP attitudes toward screening colonoscopy and their associations with CRC screening practice patterns.
Design: Cross-sectional analysis of data from a nationally representative survey conducted in 2006-2007.
Participants: 1,266 family physicians, general practitioners, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists.
Main measures: Physician-reported changes in the volume of screening tests ordered, performed or supervised in the past 3 years, attitudes toward colonoscopy, the influence of evidence and perceived norms on their recommendations, challenges to screening, and practice characteristics.
Results: The cooperation rate (excludes physicians without valid contact information) was 75%; 28% reported their volume of FOBT ordering had increased substantially or somewhat, and the majority (53%) reported their sigmoidoscopy volume decreased either substantially or somewhat. A majority (73%) reported that colonoscopy volume increased somewhat or substantially. The majority (86%) strongly agreed that colonoscopy was the best of the available CRC screening tests; 69% thought it was readily available for their patients; 59% strongly or somewhat agreed that they might be sued if they did not offer colonoscopy to their patients. All three attitudes were significantly related to substantial increases in colonoscopy ordering.
Conclusions: PCPs report greatly increased colonoscopy recommendation relative to other screening tests, and highly favorable attitudes about colonoscopy. Greater emphasis is needed on informed decision-making with patients about preferences for test options.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Are physicians' recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent?J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Feb;26(2):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1516-5. Epub 2010 Oct 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 20949328 Free PMC article.
-
A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices.Prev Med. 2003 Mar;36(3):352-62. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00066-x. Prev Med. 2003. PMID: 12634026
-
Training primary care physicians to offer their patients faecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening on an equal basis: a pilot intervention with before-after and parallel group surveys.BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e011086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011086. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27178977 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for Colorectal Cancer and Evolving Issues for Physicians and Patients: A Review.JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2135-2145. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17418. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27893135 Review.
-
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1016-1030. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174. Epub 2017 Jun 6. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28555630 Review.
Cited by
-
Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests: a systematic review and time trend analysis of nationally representative data.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Aug 21;75:102783. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102783. eCollection 2024 Sep. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 39263675 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Provider beliefs in effectiveness and recommendations for primary HPV testing in 3 health-care systems.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Jan 3;7(1):pkac086. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac086. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023. PMID: 36469348 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy Utilization for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Georgia, USA.Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 20;29(11):8955-8966. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29110703. Curr Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36421356 Free PMC article.
-
Modifications in Primary Care Clinics to Continue Colorectal Cancer Screening Promotion During the COVID-19 Pandemic.J Community Health. 2023 Feb;48(1):113-126. doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01154-9. Epub 2022 Oct 29. J Community Health. 2023. PMID: 36308666 Free PMC article.
-
Current and future colorectal cancer screening strategies.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;19(8):521-531. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00612-y. Epub 2022 May 3. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 35505243 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:132–141. - PubMed
-
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality2008. Report No.: AHRQ Publication 08-05124-EF-3.
-
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults Aged 50-75 United States 2008. MMWR Vital Signs. 2010;59:808-12. - PubMed
-
- Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:663–667. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
