Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 May 29;125(21):2639-48.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.072256. Epub 2012 May 2.

Influence of mitral regurgitation repair on survival in the surgical treatment for ischemic heart failure trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Influence of mitral regurgitation repair on survival in the surgical treatment for ischemic heart failure trial

Marek A Deja et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Whether mitral valve repair during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves survival in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) remains unknown.

Methods and results: Patients with ejection fraction ≤35% and coronary artery disease amenable to CABG were randomized at 99 sites worldwide to medical therapy with or without CABG. The decision to treat the mitral valve during CABG was left to the surgeon. The primary end point was mortality. Of 1212 randomized patients, 435 (36%) had none/trace MR, 554 (46%) had mild MR, 181 (15%) had moderate MR, and 39 (3%) had severe MR. In the medical arm, 70 deaths (32%) occurred in patients with none/trace MR, 114 (44%) in those with mild MR, and 58 (50%) in those with moderate to severe MR. In patients with moderate to severe MR, there were 29 deaths (53%) among 55 patients randomized to CABG who did not receive mitral surgery (hazard ratio versus medical therapy, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.87) and 21 deaths (43%) among 49 patients who received mitral surgery (hazard ratio versus medical therapy, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.08). After adjustment for baseline prognostic variables, the hazard ratio for CABG with mitral surgery versus CABG alone was 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.77; P=0.006).

Conclusion: Although these observational data suggest that adding mitral valve repair to CABG in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and moderate to severe MR may improve survival compared with CABG alone or medical therapy alone, a prospective randomized trial is necessary to confirm the validity of these observations.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00023595.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier estimates of death from any cause among patients assigned to MED. Separate curves for patients with site-reported none or trace, mild, and moderate-severe MR are presented.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier estimates of death from any cause in patients assigned to MED or MED and CABG with site-reported none or trace MR at baseline (A), mild MR at baseline (B), moderate-severe MR at baseline (C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier estimates of death from any cause in patients assigned to MED or MED and CABG with site-reported none or trace MR at baseline (A), mild MR at baseline (B), moderate-severe MR at baseline (C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier estimates of death from any cause in patients assigned to MED or MED and CABG with site-reported none or trace MR at baseline (A), mild MR at baseline (B), moderate-severe MR at baseline (C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier estimates of death from any cause in patients with moderate-severe MR at baseline: assigned to MED or MED and CABG who received or not mitral valve procedures (A), assigned and treated with MED or MED with CABG alone or MED with CABG and mitral valve procedure (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier estimates of death from any cause in patients with moderate-severe MR at baseline: assigned to MED or MED and CABG who received or not mitral valve procedures (A), assigned and treated with MED or MED with CABG alone or MED with CABG and mitral valve procedure (B).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bursi F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Nkomo VT, Jacobsen SJ, Weston SA, Meverden RA, Roger VL. Heart failure and death after myocardial infarction in the community: the emerging role of mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2005;111:295–301. - PubMed
    1. Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation. 2001;103:1759–1764. - PubMed
    1. Lamas GA, Mitchell GF, Flaker GC, Smith SC, Jr, Gersh BJ, Basta L, Moye L, Braunwald E, Pfeffer MA. Clinical significance of mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators. Circulation. 1997;96:827–833. - PubMed
    1. Di Mauro M, Di Giammarco G, Vitolla G, Contini M, Iaco AL, Bivona A, Weltert L, Calafiore AM. Impact of no-to-moderate mitral regurgitation on late results after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:2128–2134. - PubMed
    1. Fattouch K, Sampognaro R, Speziale G, Salardino M, Novo G, Caruso M, Novo S, Ruvolo G. Impact of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1187–94. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data