Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;8(6):720-6.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nss057. Epub 2012 May 7.

Validation of a child-friendly version of the monetary incentive delay task

Affiliations

Validation of a child-friendly version of the monetary incentive delay task

Sarah M Helfinstein et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

The monetary incentive delay (MID) task (Knutson, 2000) is an imaging paradigm used to measure neural activity of incentive receipt anticipation. The task reliably elicits striatal activation and is commonly used with both adult and adolescent populations, but is not designed for use with children. In the current article, we present data on the newly designed 'piñata task' a child-friendly analog of the MID task. We demonstrate the task can be used successfully in children to study the neural correlates of anticipatory incentive processing. Results from a behavioral study and a neuroimaging study are reported. In Study #1, a sample of 8- to 14-year-old children demonstrates expected behavioral effects: subjects responded most quickly and most accurately on trials with greater potential rewards; older children displayed faster reaction times than younger. In Study #2, 8- to 12-year-old children showed neural activation patterns consistent with those seen in adults in the MID task: activation was modulated by cue incentive value in reward-processing regions, including the striatum, thalamus, mesial prefrontal cortex and insula. Study results suggest that the piñata task is a valid analog of the MID task, and can be used to assess neural correlates of reward processing in children as young as 8-9 years of age.

Keywords: Reward; childhood; fMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial structure of the piñata task.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Whole-brain fMRI results. Regions showing parametric incentive cue-based activation, P < 0.005. x = 3.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Striatal ROI fMRI results. Parametric incentive cue-based activation in both anterior and posterior striatum, P < 0.005. Left is left.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Activation in the caudate head by cue type.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Salience-related changes in mean caudate head activation by age.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bjork JM, Knutson B, Fong GW, Caggiano DM, Bennett SM, Hommer DW. Incentive-elicited brain activation in adolescents: Similarities and differences from young adults. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24:1793–802. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjork JM, Smith AR, Chen G, Hommer DW. Adolescents, adults and rewards: comparing motivational neurocircuitry recruitment using fMRI. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11440. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen JR, Asarnow RF, Sabb FW, et al. A unique adolescent response to reward prediction errors. Nature Neuroscience. 2010;13:669–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox RW. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research. 1996;29:162–73. - PubMed
    1. Delgado MR, Miller MM, Inati S, Phelps EA. An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning. Neuroimage. 2005;24:862–73. - PubMed

Publication types