The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience
- PMID: 22570193
- PMCID: PMC3619968
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des140
The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience
Abstract
Background: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) have been studied for use for emergency contraception for at least 35 years. IUDs are safe and highly effective for emergency contraception and regular contraception, and are extremely cost-effective as an ongoing method. The objective of this study was to evaluate the existing data to estimate the efficacy of IUDs for emergency contraception.
Methods: The reference list for this study was generated from hand searching the reference lists of relevant articles and our own article archives, and electronic searches of several databases: Medline, Global Health, Clinicaltrials.gov, Popline, Wanfang Data (Chinese) and Weipu Data (Chinese). We included studies published in English or Chinese, with a defined population of women who presented for emergency contraception and were provided with an IUD, and in which the number of pregnancies was ascertained and loss to follow-up was clearly defined. Data from each article were abstracted independently by two reviewers.
Results: The 42 studies (of 274 retrieved) that met our inclusion criteria were conducted in six countries between 1979 and 2011 and included eight different types of IUD and 7034 women. The maximum timeframe from intercourse to insertion of the IUD ranged from 2 days to 10 or more days; the majority of insertions (74% of studies) occurred within 5 days of intercourse. The pregnancy rate (excluding one outlier study) was 0.09%.
Conclusions: IUDs are a highly effective method of contraception after unprotected intercourse. Because they are safe for the majority of women, highly effective and cost-effective when left in place as ongoing contraception, whenever clinically feasible IUDs should be included in the range of emergency contraception options offered to patients presenting after unprotected intercourse. This review is limited by the fact that the original studies did not provide sufficient data on the delay between intercourse and insertion of the IUD, parity, cycle day of intercourse or IUD type to allow analysis by any of these variables.
Comment in
-
Intrauterine devices provide safe and effective contraception following unprotected intercourse and beyond.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;57(5):524-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00219_3.x. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012. PMID: 22954085 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;2(2):CD013744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013744.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36847591 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26629725 English, French.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception.N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 28;384(4):335-344. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022141. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 33503342 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Interventions for emergency contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub3 PMID: 15266446 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024 Aug 8;73(3):1-77. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024. PMID: 39106301 Free PMC article.
-
An in-vivo study of the safety of copper-containing intrauterine devices in 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Dec;49(12):4592-4599. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04493-4. Epub 2024 Jul 18. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024. PMID: 39023566 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of Progestogen Hormonal Contraceptive Methods during Lactation: An Overview.Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 4;14(3):1054-1064. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14030083. Clin Pract. 2024. PMID: 38921261 Free PMC article. Review.
-
User Experience of Access to Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner and Emergency Contraception in Emergency Departments in the United States: A National Survey.West J Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;25(2):291-300. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18405. West J Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38596932 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of oral levonorgestrel emergency contraception with same day etonogestrel contraceptive implant: A prospective observational study.Contraception. 2024 Mar;131:110344. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110344. Epub 2023 Nov 25. Contraception. 2024. PMID: 38008305
References
-
- ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 112, emergency contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1100–1108. - PubMed
-
- Askalani AH, Al-Senity AM, Al-Agizy HM, Salem HI, Al-Masry GI, El-Sadek SM. Evaluation of copper T-200 as a post-coital contraceptive. Egypt Obstet Gynecol. 1987;13:63–66.
-
- Bharadwaj P, Saxton J, Mann S, Jungmann E, Stephenson J. What influences young women to choose between the emergency contraceptive pill and an intrauterine device? A qualitative study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16:201–209. - PubMed
-
- Black TRL, Goldstuck ND, Spence A. Post-coital intrauterine device insertion—a further evaluation. Contraception. 1980;22:653–658. - PubMed
-
- Bromwich PD, Parsons AD. The establishment of a postcoital contraception service. Br J Fam Plan. 1982;8:16–19.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
