Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
- PMID: 22577197
- PMCID: PMC3349781
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e2838
Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Abstract
Objective: To determine neonatal outcomes (perinatal mortality and special care unit admission) and maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, delivery complications) of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management.
Design: Retrospective cohort study using an unselected population database.
Setting: Consultant and midwife led obstetric units in Scotland 1981-2007.
Participants: 1,271,549 women with singleton pregnancies of 37 weeks or more gestation.
Interventions: Outcomes of elective induction of labour (induction of labour with no recognised medical indication) at 37, 38, 39, 40, and 41 weeks' gestation compared with those of expectant management (continuation of pregnancy to either spontaneous labour, induction of labour or caesarean section at a later gestation).
Main outcome measures: Extended perinatal mortality, mode of delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury, and admission to a neonatal or special care baby unit. Outcomes were adjusted for age at delivery, parity, year of birth, birth weight, deprivation category, and, where appropriate, mode of delivery.
Results: At each gestation between 37 and 41 completed weeks, elective induction of labour was associated with a decreased odds of perinatal mortality compared with expectant management (at 40 weeks' gestation 0.08% (37/44,764) in the induction of labour group versus 0.18% (627/350,643) in the expectant management group; adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 99% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.63), without a reduction in the odds of spontaneous vertex delivery (at 40 weeks' gestation 79.9% (35,775/44,778) in the induction of labour group versus 73.7% (258,665/350,791) in the expectant management group; adjusted odds ratio 1.26, 1.22 to 1.31). Admission to a neonatal unit was, however, increased in association with elective induction of labour at all gestations before 41 weeks (at 40 weeks' gestation 8.0% (3605/44,778) in the induction of labour group compared with 7.3% (25,572/350,791) in the expectant management group; adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 1.09 to 1.20).
Conclusion: Although residual confounding may remain, our findings indicate that elective induction of labour at term gestation can reduce perinatal mortality in developed countries without increasing the risk of operative delivery.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Figures
Comment in
-
Large population-based study finds that elective induction at term reduces perinatal mortality.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;57(5):521-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00219_1.x. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012. PMID: 22954083 No abstract available.
-
Elective induction of labour is associated with decreased perinatal mortality and lower odds of caesarean section at 40 and 41 weeks.Evid Based Med. 2013 Jun;18(3):117-8. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2012-100862. Epub 2012 Oct 20. Evid Based Med. 2013. PMID: 23086562 No abstract available.
-
Elective induction of labour on maternal request: why do we continue to deny women this option?BJOG. 2016 Dec;123(13):2198. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13871. Epub 2016 Jan 25. BJOG. 2016. PMID: 26804040 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Association between timing of labor induction and neonatal and maternal outcomes: an observational study from China.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Oct;6(10):101456. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101456. Epub 2024 Aug 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024. PMID: 39151749
-
Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):761-769. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24084532 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar;(176):1-257. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009. PMID: 19408970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.BMJ. 2019 Feb 20;364:l344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l344. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30786997 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):252-63, W53-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19687492 Review.
Cited by
-
Caesarean Section frequency in Nulliparous Women induced at 39 weeks versus conventional management: An open label random allocation study.Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1690-1694. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9099. Pak J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39281249 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiology of elective induction of labour: a timeless exposure.Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Jun 12;53(4):dyae088. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae088. Int J Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38964853 No abstract available.
-
Short stature and vaginal dinoprostone as independent predictors of composite maternal-newborn adverse outcomes in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06650-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38951754 Free PMC article.
-
Likelihood of primary cesarean section following induction of labor in singleton cephalic pregnancies at term, compared with expectant management: An Australian population-based, historical cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 May;103(5):946-954. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14785. Epub 2024 Jan 31. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024. PMID: 38291953 Free PMC article.
-
An in-depth analysis of perinatal related mortality among women of South Asian ethnicity in Aotearoa New Zealand.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05840-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37488505 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mealing NM, Roberts CL, Ford JB, Simpson JM, Morris JM. Trends in induction of labour, 1998-2007: a population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:599-605. - PubMed
-
- Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(4):CD004945. - PubMed
-
- Smith GC. Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:489-96. - PubMed
-
- Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698-704. - PubMed
-
- Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1511-5. - PubMed