Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;82(1):25-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 May 16.

Conducting an efficient proactive risk assessment prior to CPOE implementation in an intensive care unit

Affiliations

Conducting an efficient proactive risk assessment prior to CPOE implementation in an intensive care unit

Ann Schoofs Hundt et al. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop, conduct, and evaluate a proactive risk assessment (PRA) of the design and implementation of CPOE in an ICU.

Methods: We developed a PRA method based on issues identified from documented experience with conventional PRA methods and the constraints of an organization about to implement CPOE in an intensive care unit. The PRA method consists of three phases: planning (three months), team (one five-hour meeting), and evaluation (short- and long-term).

Results: Sixteen unique relevant vulnerabilities were identified as a result of the PRA team's efforts. Negative consequences resulting from the vulnerabilities included potential patient safety and quality of care issues, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, increases in cognitive burden on CPOE users, and/or worker inconvenience or distress. Actions taken to address the vulnerabilities included redesign of the technology, process (workflow) redesign, user training, and/or ongoing monitoring. Verbal and written evaluation by the team members indicated that the PRA method was useful and that participants were willing to participate in future PRAs. Long-term evaluation was accomplished by monitoring an ongoing "issues list" of CPOE problems identified by or reported to IT staff. Vulnerabilities identified by the team were either resolved prior to CPOE implementation (n=7) or shortly thereafter (n=9). No other issues were identified beside those identified by the team.

Conclusions: Generally positive results from the various evaluations including a long-term evaluation demonstrate the value of developing an efficient PRA method that meets organizational and contextual requirements and constraints.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRA timeline
Figure 2
Figure 2
Existing workflow - Transfer from OR directly to ICU (pre-CPOE)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proposed workflow - Transfer from OR directly to ICU (with CPOE)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Informatics Association. 2004;11(2):104–112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone KP, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2007;76(Supplement):S21–S27. - PubMed
    1. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005;293(10):1197–1203. - PubMed
    1. Horsky J, Kuperman GJ, Patel V. Comprehensive analysis of a medication dosing error related to CPOE. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2005;12(4):377–382. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carayon P, Schoofs-Hundt A, Karsh B-T, Gurses AP, Alvarado CJ, Smith M, et al. Work system design for patient safety: The SEIPS model. Quality and Safety Health Care. 2006;15:50–58. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms