Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Jun;42(6):655-62.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.013.

Efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for young adults: a meta-analysis

Jerry M Suls  1 , Tana M Luger, Susan J Curry, Robin J Mermelstein, Amy K Sporer, Larry C An
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for young adults: a meta-analysis

Jerry M Suls et al. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Context: Approximately 22% of U.S. young adults (aged 18-24 years) are smokers. Young adults typically display an interest in quitting, but it is unknown whether the evidence-based cessation programs designed for adults will be equally effective for young adults. This meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of smoking-cessation programs for this population.

Evidence acquisition: In 2009-2011, studies published between 2004 and 2008 that investigated smoking cessation were first found through the DHHS Clinical Practice Guidelines for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence as well as a PubMed search (2009-2010) and were then subjected to a rigorous inclusion process. Authors were contacted to glean raw data for young adults. Fourteen studies provided data that were coded for descriptive information and aggregated using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 2.0.

Evidence synthesis: Among young adults, any type of intervention was more effective in producing successful smoking cessation than the control. This was the case for intent-to-treat analyses as well as complete cases. When interventions were effective for the larger adult sample, they were also effective for the younger adult sample.

Conclusions: Although young adults tend to underutilize evidence-based cessation treatments, the current meta-analysis showed that these treatments should be as effective for young adults as they are for the general adult population. Thus, it may be useful to focus on motivating young adults to seek cessation treatment to increase utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of study selection and author contact procedure USPSTF, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. MMWR. Vital signs: Current cigarette smoking among adults aged > 18 years—U S 2009. 2010;59:1135–1140. - PubMed
    1. MMWR. Cigarette smoking among adults—2007. 2008;57:1221–1226. - PubMed
    1. Fiore FC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, Bailey WC, Benowitz NL, Curry SJ. Clinical Practice Guideline. DHHS Public Health Service; Rockville, MD: May, 2008. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. - PubMed
    1. Bornstein M, Rothstein H. Englewood, NJ. Biostat; 2009. Comprehensive meta-analysis: a computer program for research synthesis.
    1. DHHS. Preventing tobacco use among young people: a report of the surgeon general. DHHS, Public Health Service, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; Atlanta, Georgia: 1994.

Publication types