What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model?

Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):44-66. doi: 10.1177/0163278712446066. Epub 2012 May 21.


Many grant proposals identify the use of a given evaluation model or framework but offer little about how such models are implemented. The authors discuss what it means to employ a specific model, RE-AIM, and key dimensions from this model for program planning, implementation, evaluation, and reporting. The authors report both conceptual and content specifications for the use of the RE-AIM model and a content review of 42 recent dissemination and implementation grant applications to National Institutes of Health that proposed the use of this model. Outcomes include the extent to which proposals addressed the overall RE-AIM model and specific items within the five dimensions in their methods or evaluation plans. The majority of grants used only some elements of the model (less than 10% contained thorough measures across all RE-AIM dimensions). Few met criteria for "fully developed use" of RE-AIM and the percentage of key issues addressed varied from, on average, 45% to 78% across the RE-AIM dimensions. The results and discussion of key criteria should help investigators in their use of RE-AIM and illuminate the broader issue of comprehensive use of evaluation models.

MeSH terms

  • Communication
  • Evidence-Based Practice / organization & administration*
  • Evidence-Based Practice / standards
  • Health Promotion
  • Humans
  • National Cancer Institute (U.S.) / standards*
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / organization & administration*
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / standards
  • Program Evaluation
  • Research Design / standards*
  • Research Support as Topic / standards*
  • United States