Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 23;8(5):768-71.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0282. Epub 2012 May 23.

Diversity-disturbance relationships: frequency and intensity interact

Affiliations

Diversity-disturbance relationships: frequency and intensity interact

Alex R Hall et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

An influential ecological theory, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH), predicts that intermediate levels of disturbance will maximize species diversity. Empirical studies, however, have described a wide variety of diversity-disturbance relationships (DDRs). Using experimental populations of microbes, we show that the form of the DDR depends on an interaction between disturbance frequency and intensity. We find that diversity shows a monotonically increasing, unimodal or flat relationship with disturbance, depending on the values of the disturbance aspects considered. These results confirm recent theoretical predictions, and potentially reconcile the conflicting body of empirical evidence on DDRs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Diversity, measured as the complement of Simpson's index (1−λ, where formula image and pi is the proportion of the ith morph), is shown for each of five disturbance frequencies (left to right in each series, 0, 1, 4, 8 or 16 disturbances over 16 days) at each of three disturbance intensities. Points show means ± s.e. for three replicate microcosms. (b) Frequencies of different morphotypes (WS, four subcategories, each a different shade of grey; SM, white bars; FS, black bars) at each combination of disturbance intensity and frequency. Bars show mean ± s.e. for three replicate microcosms at each disturbance frequency (from left to right in each group of five bars: 0, 1, 4, 8, 16 disturbances) and intensity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–36610.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343) - DOI - DOI
    1. Levin S. A., Paine R. T. 1974. Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 2744–274710.1073/pnas.71.7.2744 (doi:10.1073/pnas.71.7.2744) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenzweig M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
    1. Roxburgh S. H., Shea K., Wilson J. B. 2004. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85, 359–37110.1890/03-0266 (doi:10.1890/03-0266) - DOI - DOI
    1. Sousa W. P. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 353–39110.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002033 (doi:10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002033) - DOI - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources