Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;27(11):1438-44.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2100-y. Epub 2012 May 30.

Outcomes for resident-identified high-risk patients and resident perspectives of year-end continuity clinic handoffs

Affiliations

Outcomes for resident-identified high-risk patients and resident perspectives of year-end continuity clinic handoffs

Amber T Pincavage et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Many patients nationwide change their primary care physician (PCP) when internal medicine (IM) residents graduate. Few studies have examined this handoff.

Objective: To assess patient outcomes and resident perspectives after the year-end continuity clinic handoff

Design: Retrospective cohort

Participants: Patients who underwent a year-end clinic handoff in July 2010 and a comparison group of all other resident clinic patients from 2009-2011. PGY2 IM residents surveyed from 2010-2011.

Measurements: Percent of high-risk patients after the clinic handoff scheduled for an appointment, who saw their assigned PCP, lost to follow-up, or had an acute visit (ED or hospitalization). Perceptions of PGY2 IM residents surveyed after receiving a clinic handoff.

Results: Thirty graduating residents identified 258 high-risk patients. While nearly all patients (97 %) were scheduled, 29 % missed or cancelled their first new PCP visit. Only 44 % of patients saw the correct PCP and six months later, one-fifth were lost to follow-up. Patients not seen by a new PCP after the handoff were less likely to have appropriate follow-up for pending tests (0 % vs. 63 %, P<0.001). A higher mean no show rate (NSR) was observed among patients who missed their first new PCP visit (22 % vs. 16 % NSR, p<0.001) and those lost to follow-up (21 % vs. 17 % NSR, p=0.019). While 47 % of residents worried about missing important data during the handoff, 47 % reported that they do not perceive patients as "theirs" until they are seen by them in clinic.

Conclusions: While most patients were scheduled for appointments after a clinic handoff, many did not see the correct resident and one-fifth were lost to follow-up. Patients who miss appointments are especially at risk of poor clinic handoff outcomes. Future efforts should improve patient attendance to their first new PCP visit and increase PCP ownership.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Year-end clinic handoff process map and handoff outcomes. This figure represents the process map for potential patient outcomes during the year-end clinic handoff. Handoff outcomes for the high-risk patients are presented in the text boxes as percent of patients (n = 258) with the specified outcome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Young JQ, Wachter RM. Academic year-end transfers of outpatients from outgoing to incoming residents: an unaddressed patient safety issue. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1327–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1399. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Internal Medicine. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC_140/140_prIndex.asp Accessed March 27, 2012.
    1. Young JQ, Eisendrath SJ. Enhancing patient safety and resident education during the academic year-end transfer of outpatients: lessons from the suicide of a psychiatric patient. Acad Psych. 2011;35(1):54–7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.35.1.54. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Moglelnicki RP, Frey WG, Sox CH, Gaudette C, Rockwell A. Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men. A randomized trial. JAMA. 1984;252(17):2413–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.1984.03350170015011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caines LC, Brockmeyer DM, Tess AV, Kim H, Kriegel G, Bates CK. The revolving door of resident continuity practice. Identifying gaps in transitions of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;6(9):995–8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1731-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources