Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 15;118(24):6217-25.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.27635. Epub 2012 May 30.

Influence of health insurance coverage on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care settings

Affiliations

Influence of health insurance coverage on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care settings

Patricia A Carney et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The current study was performed to determine, in rural settings, the relation between the type and status of insurance coverage and being up-to-date for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

Methods: Four primary care practices in 2 rural Oregon communities participated. Medical chart reviews that were conducted between October 2008 and August 2009 assessed insurance coverage and up-to-date status for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Inclusion criteria involved having at least 1 health care visit within the past 5 years and being aged ≥ 55 years.

Results: The majority of patients were women aged 55 years to 70 years, employed or retired, and who had private health insurance and an average of 2.5 comorbid conditions. The overall percentage of eligible women who were up-to-date for cervical cancer screening was 30%; approximately 27% of women were up-to-date for clinical breast examination, 37% were up-to-date for mammography, and 19% were up-to-date for both mammography and clinical breast examination. Approximately 38% of men and 35% of women were up-to-date for colorectal cancer screening using any test at appropriate screening intervals. In general, having any insurance versus being uninsured was associated with undergoing cancer screening. For each type of screening, patients who had at least 1 health maintenance visit were significantly more likely to be up-to-date compared with those with no health maintenance visits. A significant interaction was found between having health maintenance visits, having any health insurance, and being up-to-date for cancer screening tests.

Conclusions: Overall, the percentage of patients who were up-to-date for any cancer screening, especially cervical cancer screening, was found to be very low in rural Oregon. Patients with some form of health insurance were more likely to have had a health maintenance visit within the previous 2 years and to be up-to-date for breast, cervical, and/or colorectal cancer screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Evidence Syntheses, No. 74. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); Nov, 2009. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Screening for Breast Cancer Systematic Evidence Review Update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Report No.: 10-05142-EF-1. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Systematic Evidence Reviews, No. 25. Research Triangle Institute/University of North Carolina; Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); Jan, 2002. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Evidence Review: Screening for Cervical Cancer.
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Evidence Syntheses, No. 65.1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); Oct, 2008. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Screening for Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review. Report No.: 08-05-05124-EF-1 ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK35179/)
    1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. Cancer Screening in the United States, 2007: A Review of Current Guidelines, Practices, and Prospects. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007:90–104. - PubMed
    1. Breen N, Cronin KA, Meissner HI, Taplin SH, Tangka FK, Tiro JA, McNeel TS. Reported Drop in Mammography. Cancer. 2007;109:2405–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms