Chapter 10: deciding whether to complement a systematic review of medical tests with decision modeling
- PMID: 22648678
- PMCID: PMC3364358
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2019-3
Chapter 10: deciding whether to complement a systematic review of medical tests with decision modeling
Abstract
Limited by what is reported in the literature, most systematic reviews of medical tests focus on "test accuracy" (or better, test performance), rather than on the impact of testing on patient outcomes. The link between testing, test results and patient outcomes is typically complex: even when testing has high accuracy, there is no guarantee that physicians will act according to test results, that patients will follow their orders, or that the intervention will yield a beneficial endpoint. Therefore, test performance is typically not sufficient for assessing the usefulness of medical tests. Modeling (in the form of decision or economic analysis) is a natural framework for linking test performance data to clinical outcomes. We propose that (some) modeling should be considered to facilitate the interpretation of summary test performance measures by connecting testing and patient outcomes. We discuss a simple algorithm for helping systematic reviewers think through this possibility, and illustrate it by means of an example.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Deciding Whether To Complement a Systematic Review of Medical Tests With Decision Modeling.In: Chang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA, editors. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun. Chapter 10. In: Chang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA, editors. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun. Chapter 10. PMID: 22834021 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Chapter 2: medical tests guidance (2) developing the topic and structuring systematic reviews of medical tests: utility of PICOTS, analytic frameworks, decision trees, and other frameworks.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2007-7. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22648670 Free PMC article.
-
Chapter 6: assessing applicability of medical test studies in systematic reviews.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S39-46. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1961-9. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22648674 Free PMC article.
-
Chapter 3: choosing the important outcomes for a systematic review of a medical test.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S20-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1802-x. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22648671 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_part_2-200506211-00004. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15968029 Review.
Cited by
-
Sonoelastography for Testicular Tumor Identification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 25;15(15):3770. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153770. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37568585 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Generating and evaluating evidence of the clinical utility of molecular diagnostic tests in oncology.Genet Med. 2016 Aug;18(8):780-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.162. Epub 2015 Dec 3. Genet Med. 2016. PMID: 26633547
-
A flexible, multifaceted approach is needed in health technology assessment of PET.J Nucl Med. 2014 Aug;55(8):1225-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.142331. Epub 2014 Jul 21. J Nucl Med. 2014. PMID: 25047328 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A framework for crafting clinical practice guidelines that are relevant to the care and management of people with multimorbidity.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Apr;29(4):670-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2659-y. Epub 2014 Jan 18. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24442332 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chapter 8: meta-analysis of test performance when there is a "gold standard".J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S56-66. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2029-1. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22648676 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, et al. Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(12 Pt 2):1048–1055. - PubMed
-
- Claxton K, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Philips Z, Palmer S. A pilot study on the use of decision theory and value of information analysis as part of the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(31):1–103. - PubMed
-
- Meltzer DO, Hoomans T, Chung JW, Basu A. Minimal Modeling Approaches to Value of Information Analysis for Health Research. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011. - PubMed
-
- Trikalinos TA, Dahabreh IJ, Wong J, Rao M. Future Research Needs for the Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions with Bypass Graft Surgery in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: Identification of Future Research Needs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2010. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
