Variation in primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations by patient age and comorbidity
- PMID: 22653380
- PMCID: PMC3539036
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2093-6
Variation in primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations by patient age and comorbidity
Abstract
Background: Screening patterns among primary care physicians (PCPs) may be influenced by patient age and comorbidity. Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has little benefit among patients with limited life expectancy.
Objective: To characterize the extent to which PCPs modify their recommendations for CRC screening based upon patients' increasing age and/or worsening comorbidity
Design: Cross-sectional, nationally representative survey.
Participants: The study comprised primary care physicians (n = 1,266) including general internal medicine, family practice, and obstetrics-gynecology physicians.
Main measures: Physician CRC screening recommendations among patients of varying age and comorbidity were measured based upon clinical vignettes. Independent variables in adjusted models included physician and practice characteristics.
Key results: For an 80-year-old patient with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 25 % of PCPs recommended CRC screening. For an 80-year-old patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy (New York Heart Association, Class II), 71 % of PCPs recommended CRC screening. PCPs were more likely to recommend fecal occult blood testing than colonoscopy as the preferred screening modality for a healthy 80-year-old, compared to healthy 50- or 65-year-old patients (19 % vs. 5 % vs. 2 % p < 0.001). For an 80-year-old with unresectable NSCLC, PCPs who were an obstetrics-gynecology physician were more likely to recommend CRC screening, while those with a full electronic medical record were less likely to recommend screening.
Conclusions: PCPs consider comorbidity when screening older patients for CRC and may change the screening modality from colonoscopy to FOBT. However, a sizable proportion of PCPs would recommend screening for patients with advanced cancer who would not benefit. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these patterns will facilitate the design of future medical education and policy interventions to reduce unnecessary care.
Figures
Comment in
-
Too much of a good thing: cancer screening in the old and infirm.J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):6-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2233-z. J Gen Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23054924 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Primary care colorectal cancer screening recommendation patterns: associated factors and screening outcomes.Med Decis Making. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):198-208. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11406285. Epub 2011 Jun 7. Med Decis Making. 2012. PMID: 21652776 Free PMC article.
-
A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices.Prev Med. 2003 Mar;36(3):352-62. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00066-x. Prev Med. 2003. PMID: 12634026
-
Variation in colorectal cancer testing between primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland.Int J Public Health. 2019 Sep;64(7):1075-1083. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01259-4. Epub 2019 Jun 15. Int J Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31201428
-
Screening for colorectal cancer: the role of the primary care physician.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;29(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000759. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 27676092 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Skin Cancer Education Interventions for Primary Care Providers: A Scoping Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jul;37(9):2267-2279. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07501-9. Epub 2022 Jun 16. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 35710666 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners' Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(13):2998-3020. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4. Epub 2023 May 4. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37142822 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived Barriers Among Clinicians and Older Adults Aged 65 and Older Regarding Use of Life Expectancy to Inform Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review and Comparison.Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Aug;80(4):372-385. doi: 10.1177/10775587231153269. Epub 2023 Feb 18. Med Care Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 36800914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion.Cancer Causes Control. 2021 May;32(5):555-565. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01408-2. Epub 2021 Mar 9. Cancer Causes Control. 2021. PMID: 33687606 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of Clinician Decision-making on Cancer Screening Cessation in Older Adults With Limited Life Expectancy.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206772. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6772. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32511720 Free PMC article.
-
Time trends in prostate cancer screening in Swiss primary care (2010 to 2017) - A retrospective study.PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0217879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217879. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31194773 Free PMC article.
References
-
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–37. - PubMed
-
- Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(3):130–60. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0018. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):605–13. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
