Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):1050-8.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000754. Epub 2012 Jun 3.

Modeling nurses' acceptance of bar coded medication administration technology at a pediatric hospital

Affiliations

Modeling nurses' acceptance of bar coded medication administration technology at a pediatric hospital

Richard J Holden et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To identify predictors of nurses' acceptance of bar coded medication administration (BCMA).

Design: Cross-sectional survey of registered nurses (N=83) at an academic pediatric hospital that recently implemented BCMA.

Methods: Surveys assessed seven BCMA-related perceptions: ease of use; usefulness for the job; social influence from non-specific others to use BCMA; training; technical support; usefulness for patient care; and social influence from patients/families. An all possible subset regression procedure with five goodness-of-fit indicators was used to identify which set of perceptions best predicted BCMA acceptance (intention to use, satisfaction).

Results: Nurses reported a moderate perceived ease of use and low perceived usefulness of BCMA. Nurses perceived moderate-or-higher social influence to use BCMA and had moderately positive perceptions of BCMA-related training and technical support. Behavioral intention to use BCMA was high, but satisfaction was low. Behavioral intention to use was best predicted by perceived ease of use, perceived social influence from non-specific others, and perceived usefulness for patient care (56% of variance explained). Satisfaction was best predicted by perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness for patient care, and perceived social influence from patients/families (76% of variance explained).

Discussion: Variation in and low scores on ease of use and usefulness are concerning, especially as these variables often correlate with acceptance, as found in this study. Predicting acceptance benefited from using a broad set of perceptions and adapting variables to the healthcare context.

Conclusion: Success with BCMA and other technologies can benefit from assessing end-user acceptance and elucidating the factors promoting acceptance and use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study conceptual model and the specific perception, demographic, and acceptance variables used to test it. aIn the technology acceptance literature, these are predicted to moderate the perceptions–acceptance relationship. TAM, Technology Acceptance Model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fit indices and unstandardized parameter estimates from best subset regression models. *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01. AIC, Akaike information criterion; BCMA, bar coded medication administration; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; Cp, Mallow's Cp statistic; RMSE, root mean square error.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine Preventing Medication Errors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007
    1. Kopp BJ, Erstad BL, Allen ME, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in an intensive care unit: direct observation approach for detection. Crit Care Med 2006;34:415–25 - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events - implications for prevention. JAMA 1995;274:29–34 - PubMed
    1. Walsh KE, Kaushal R, Chessare JB. How to avoid pediatric medication errors: a user's guide to the literature. Arch Dis Childhood 2005;90:698–702 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. JAMA 1995;274:35–43 - PubMed

Publication types