Effect of the Medicare Part D coverage gap on medication use among patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia

Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 5;156(11):776-84, W-263, W-264, W-265, W-266, W-267, W-268, W-269. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-11-201206050-00004.

Abstract

Background: Prior studies of the Medicare Part D coverage gap are limited in generalizability and scope.

Objective: To determine the effect of the coverage gap on drugs used for asymptomatic (antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs) and symptomatic (pain relievers, acid suppressants, and antidepressants) conditions in elderly patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia.

Design: Quasi-experimental study using pre-post design and contemporaneous control group.

Setting: Medicare claims files from 2005 and 2006 for 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries.

Patients: Part D plan enrollees with hypertension or hyperlipidemia aged 65 years or older who had no coverage, generic-only coverage, or both brand-name and generic coverage during the gap in 2006. Patients who were fully eligible for the low-income subsidy served as the control group.

Measurements: Monthly 30-day supply prescriptions available, medication adherence, and continuous medication gaps of 30 days or more for antihypertensive or lipid-lowering drugs; monthly 30-day supply prescriptions available for pain relievers, acid suppressants, or antidepressants before and after coverage gap entry.

Results: Patients with no gap coverage had a decrease in monthly antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drug prescriptions during the coverage gap. Nonadherence also increased in this group (antihypertensives: odds ratio [OR], 1.60 [95% CI, 1.50 to 1.71]; lipid-lowering drugs: OR, 1.59 [CI, 1.50 to 1.68]). The proportion of patients with no gap coverage who had continuous medication gaps in lipid-lowering medication use and antihypertensive use increased by an absolute 7.3% (OR, 1.38 [CI, 1.29 to 1.46]) and 3.2% (OR, 1.35 [CI, 1.25 to 1.45]), respectively, because of the coverage gap. Decreases in use were smaller for pain relievers and antidepressants and larger for acid suppressants in patients with no gap coverage. Patients with generic-only coverage had decreased use of cardiovascular medications but no change in use of drugs for symptomatic conditions. No measures changed in the brand-name and generic coverage groups. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main findings.

Limitation: Because this study was nonrandomized, unobserved differences may still exist between study groups.

Conclusion: The Part D coverage gap was associated with decreased use of medications for hypertension and hyperlipidemia in patients with no gap coverage and generic-only gap coverage. The proposed phasing out of the gap by 2020 will benefit such patients; however, use of low-value medications may also increase.

Primary funding source: Penn-Pfizer Alliance and American Heart Association.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Analgesics / therapeutic use
  • Antacids / economics
  • Antacids / therapeutic use
  • Antidepressive Agents / economics
  • Antidepressive Agents / therapeutic use
  • Antihypertensive Agents / economics*
  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use
  • Drug Prescriptions / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hyperlipidemias / drug therapy
  • Hyperlipidemias / economics
  • Hypertension / drug therapy
  • Hypertension / economics
  • Hypolipidemic Agents / economics*
  • Hypolipidemic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Insurance Coverage*
  • Male
  • Medicare Part D*
  • Medication Adherence / statistics & numerical data*
  • Prescription Fees*
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors / economics
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • United States

Substances

  • Analgesics
  • Antacids
  • Antidepressive Agents
  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Hypolipidemic Agents
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors