Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;9(4):210-20.
doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00256.x. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

Roadmap for a participatory research-practice partnership to implement evidence

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Roadmap for a participatory research-practice partnership to implement evidence

Margaret B Harrison et al. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Our research team has undertaken implementation of evidence in the form of practice guideline recommendations for populations in hospital, community, and long-term care settings with diverse provider and patient populations (people with chronic wounds, e.g., pressure and leg ulcers, heart failure, stroke, diabetes, palliative care, cancer, and maternity care). Translating evidence into clinical practice at the point of care is a complex and often overwhelming challenge for the health system as well as for individual practitioners.

Purpose: To ensure that best available evidence is integrated into practice, "local evidence" needs to be generated and this process accomplishes a number of things: it focuses all involved on the "same page," identifies important facilitating factors as well as barriers, provides empirical support for planning, and in itself is a key aspect of implementation. In doing this work, we developed a roadmap, the Queen's University Research Roadmap for Knowledge Implementation (QuRKI) that outlines three major phases of linked research and implementation activity: (1) issue identification/clarification; (2) solution building; and (3) implementation, evaluation, and nurturing the change. In this paper, we describe our practical experience as researchers working at point-of-care and how research can be used to facilitate the implementation of evidence. An exemplar is used to illustrate the fluid interplay of research and implementation activities and present the range of supporting research.

Implications: QuRKI serves as a guide for researchers in the formation of a strategic alliance with the practice community for undertaking evidence-informed reorganization of care. Using this collaborative approach, researchers play an integral role in focusing on, and using evidence during all discussions. We welcome further evaluation of its usefulness in the field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Queen’s University research roadmap for knowledge implementation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phase I: Issue/problem identification/clarification.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phase II: Solution building.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Phase III: Implementation, evaluation and sustainability.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Queen’s University research roadmap for knowledge implementation illustrated with leg ulcer exemplar.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baly M. As Miss Nightengale said…. 2nd edn. London: Bailliere Tindall & Cox; 1997.
    1. Bick D, Graham ID. 7 outcomes of implementation that matter to health services users. In: Bick D, Graham I, editors. Evaluating the impact of implementing evidence-based practice. OxfordUK: John Wiley & Sons; 2010. pp. 124–143.
    1. Cullum NA, Nelson EA, Fletcher AW, Sheldon T. Compression for preventing recurrence of venous leg ulcers. LondonUK: Cochrane Library; 1999. (systematic review).
    1. Fisher A, Denis N, Harrison MB, McNamee M, Friedberg E, Wells G. Quality management in skin care: Understanding the problem of pressure ulcers. Canadian Journal of Quality in Health Care. 1996;13(1):4–11.
    1. Friedberg E, Harrison MB. Current home care expenditures for persons with leg ulcers. Journal of Wound and Ostomy & Continence Nursing. 2002;29(4):186–192. - PubMed

MeSH terms