Risk assessment for cancer-associated thrombosis: what is the best approach?
- PMID: 22682117
- DOI: 10.1016/S0049-3848(12)70009-9
Risk assessment for cancer-associated thrombosis: what is the best approach?
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an increasingly frequent complication of cancer and its treatments. One in five cancer patients are estimated to develop venous and arterial events during the natural history of their illness. However, the risk for VTE varies widely between various subgroups of cancer patients and even in the same cancer patient over time. This narrative review focuses on risk factors, biomarkers and risk assessment tools and attempts to clarify approaches to risk stratification. Clinical risk factors include primary site of cancer, chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, surgery and hospitalization. Predictive and candidate biomarkers include platelet and leukocyte counts, hemoglobin, D-dimer and tissue factor. However, single risk factors or biomarkers have not, in general, been able to identify sufficiently high-risk populations. A clinical risk score, incorporating 5 simple clinical and laboratory variables, has now been studied in over 10,000 patients and can successfully categorize patients at low- and high-risk for VTE. Recent trials have shown that outpatient prophylactic anticoagulation is both safe and effective, but event rates have been highly variable. Targeted thromboprophylaxis provides an optimal risk-benefit ratio and the best opportunity to reduce the burden of VTE and its consequences for patients with cancer.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Emerging risk stratification approaches to cancer-associated thrombosis: risk factors, biomarkers and a risk score.Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125 Suppl 2:S1-7. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(10)00227-6. Thromb Res. 2010. PMID: 20433985 Review.
-
Accounting for death as a competing risk in cancer-associated thrombosis studies.Thromb Res. 2012 Apr;129 Suppl 1:S85-7. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(12)70023-3. Thromb Res. 2012. PMID: 22682141
-
Risk of venous thromboembolism and primary prophylaxis in cancer. Should all patients receive thromboprophylaxis?Hamostaseologie. 2012;32(2):132-7. doi: 10.5482/ha-1173. Epub 2011 Aug 8. Hamostaseologie. 2012. PMID: 21822526
-
Predictive potential of haemostatic biomarkers for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.Thromb Res. 2012 Apr;129 Suppl 1:S6-9. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(12)70008-7. Thromb Res. 2012. PMID: 22682135
-
Epidemiology, risk and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in cancer.Hamostaseologie. 2012;32(2):115-25. doi: 10.5482/ha-1170. Epub 2011 Oct 5. Hamostaseologie. 2012. PMID: 21971578 Review.
Cited by
-
Fundamentals in Covid-19-Associated Thrombosis: Molecular and Cellular Aspects.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 17;8:785738. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.785738. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34977191 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and thrombotic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Jun;51(6):e13559. doi: 10.1111/eci.13559. Epub 2021 Apr 14. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021. PMID: 33772772 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Risk Factors, Molecular Mechanisms, Future Management.Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020 Jan-Dec;26:1076029620954282. doi: 10.1177/1076029620954282. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020. PMID: 32877229 Free PMC article.
-
Novel Aspects of Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.Cells. 2019 Jul 13;8(7):716. doi: 10.3390/cells8070716. Cells. 2019. PMID: 31337034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mecanismos do tromboembolismo venoso no câncer: uma revisão da literatura.J Vasc Bras. 2017 Oct-Dec;16(4):308-313. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.007817. J Vasc Bras. 2017. PMID: 29930665 Free PMC article. Review. Portuguese.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
