Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 11;9:19.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-9-19.

Effects of a Fact Sheet on Beliefs About the Harmfulness of Alternative Nicotine Delivery Systems Compared With Cigarettes

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Effects of a Fact Sheet on Beliefs About the Harmfulness of Alternative Nicotine Delivery Systems Compared With Cigarettes

Ron Borland et al. Harm Reduct J. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: This study explored the value of providing information in a Fact Sheet to correct misperceptions about the relative harmfulness of nicotine replacement products (NRT) and smokeless tobacco (ST), when compared to cigarette smoking.

Methods: Four convenience samples from different countries (Australia, UK, Sweden and USA) were surveyed concerning their beliefs about the relative harmfulness of smokeless tobacco and NRT. Study participants were given the Fact Sheet that explained that nicotine, as used by consumers, is not particularly harmful and explained why. They were resurveyed one week later regarding their beliefs about the relative harmfulness of smokeless tobacco and NRT and future intentions to use the products.

Results: In all four samples knowledge increased by similar amounts and beliefs regarding the lower harmfulness of smokeless tobacco increased. However, misconceptions remained common and responses to belief measures were not always consistent. Likelihood of use of ST increased in all four samples after exposure to the Fact Sheet, but interest in NRT use only increased in the US sample.

Conclusions: A Fact Sheet such as this one can help address misconceptions about NRT and smokeless tobacco, at least in the short term. However, as is true of most educational interventions, exposure to a single educational session is not sufficient to overcome misperceptions that smokers have about the relative harmfulness of oral versus combustible forms of nicotine delivery.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 12 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Foulds J, Ramstrom L, Burke M, Fagerström K. Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden. Tob Control. 2003;12:349–359. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.4.349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodu B, Jansson C. Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer: a review of the risks and their determinants. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15:252–263. doi: 10.1177/154411130401500502. - DOI - PubMed
    1. IARC. IARC Monographs. Volume 89 Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; 2007. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy DT, Mumford EA, Cummings KM, Gilpin EA, Giovino G, Hyland A, Sweanor D, Warner KE. The Relative Risks of a Low-Nitrosamine Smokeless Tobacco Product Compared with Smoking Cigarettes: Estimates of a Panel of Experts. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2004;13:2035–2042. - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Physicians. Harm reduction in nicotine addiction: Helping people who can’t quit. A report by the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians –CODE: 15120 000(006) ISBN: 9781860163197 (2007)

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback