Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;12(3):84-6.
doi: 10.5698/1535-7511-12.3.84.

Be sure to read the fine print: the agency for healthcare research and quality comparative effectiveness report on antiepileptic drugs

Be sure to read the fine print: the agency for healthcare research and quality comparative effectiveness report on antiepileptic drugs

Timothy E Welty et al. Epilepsy Curr. 2012 May.

Abstract

For many questions related to the pharmacotherapy of epilepsy, there are few or no published data. This lack of data presents dilemmas to practitioners who must make informed, rational decisions about therapy on a daily basis and to policymakers dealing with drug formulary management and reimbursement. Reliance on randomized, clinical trial data is inefficient because of the extensive time and expense involved in conducting a study and the inability to answer every question encountered in practice. In addition, results from randomized, clinical studies are not fully applicable in the clinical setting because of short trial duration and the frequent use of surrogate controls that are rarely seen in routine practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. What is comparative effectiveness research. http://http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/what-is-compara.... Accessed March 13, 2012.
    1. Cox E, Martin BC, Van Staa T, Garbe E, Siebert U, Johnson ML. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part II. Value Health. 2009;12:1053–1061. - PubMed
    1. Gibbons RJ, Gardner TJ, Anderson JL, Goldstein LB, Meltzer N, Weintraub WS, Yancy CW, on behalf of the American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee The American Heart Association's principles for comparative effectiveness research: A policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;119:2955–2962. - PubMed
    1. Luce BR, Kramer JM, Goodman SN, Connor JT, Tunis S, Whicher D, Schwartz JS. Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: The need for transformational change. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:206–209. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Evidence-based practice center systematic review protocol: Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of antiepileptic medication in patients with epilepsy. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/159/463/EpilepsyCER.... Accessed February 15, 2012. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources