Foreseeing super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a perspective for clinicians
- PMID: 22698491
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.074
Foreseeing super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a perspective for clinicians
Comment on
-
Predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and associated improvement in clinical outcome: the MADIT-CRT (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy) study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 19;59(25):2366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.065. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22698490 Clinical Trial.
Similar articles
-
"Super-responders" and "hypo-responders": neglecting the obvious question?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 20;60(21):2258; author reply 2258-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.059. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 23153851 No abstract available.
-
Predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and associated improvement in clinical outcome: the MADIT-CRT (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy) study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 19;59(25):2366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.065. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22698490 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of low versus high (>40 mm Hg) pulse pressure to predict the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure (from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial).Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 1;114(7):1053-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Jul 17. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25118116 Clinical Trial.
-
Lessons learned from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Feb;26(2):137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 30. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016. PMID: 26051208 Review.
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Advanced Heart Failure.Heart Fail Clin. 2016 Jul;12(3):423-36. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2016.03.010. Heart Fail Clin. 2016. PMID: 27371518 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of electrocardiogram parameters and echocardiographic response between distinct left bundle branch area pacing modes in heart failure patients.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 29;11:1441241. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1441241. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39267805 Free PMC article.
-
Conduction system pacing is superior to biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: Insights from the pooled clinical studies.Front Physiol. 2023 May 5;14:1125340. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1125340. eCollection 2023. Front Physiol. 2023. PMID: 37215180 Free PMC article.
-
Abnormal Conduction-Induced Cardiomyopathy: JACC Review Topic of the Week.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Mar 28;81(12):1192-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.01.040. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36948737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Device-evaluated autonomic nervous function for predicting ventricular arrhythmias and all-cause mortality in patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator.Front Physiol. 2023 Feb 2;14:1090038. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1090038. eCollection 2023. Front Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36818447 Free PMC article.
-
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 May 14;3(4):358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.004. eCollection 2022 Aug. Heart Rhythm O2. 2022. PMID: 36097454 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
