Fidaxomicin for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: epidemiological method for estimation of warranted price
- PMID: 22708825
- PMCID: PMC3742423
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03261906
Fidaxomicin for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: epidemiological method for estimation of warranted price
Abstract
Background: Fidaxomicin is a macrocyclic antibiotic approved in 2011 by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD).
Objective: Herein, we present an epidemiological method to estimate, on a case mix basis, and from the perspective of the US health system, the warranted (justifiable) price per day for fidaxomicin, as a percent of the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) per day for fidaxomicin ($US280).
Methods: Data from two randomized controlled studies (Optimer-003 [n = 596] and Optimer-004 [n = 509]) were used to discern the number-needed-to-treat (NNT = 7.1) for sustained clinical response. Sustained clinical response was defined as clinical response at the end of treatment, and survival without proven or suspected CDAD recurrence through 25 days beyond the end of treatment. National data for primary and secondary cases (the case mix) of CDAD (mean hospital length of stay [LOS], and mean cost) were derived from the 2009 US Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The method for attribution of hospital LOS for secondary cases of CDAD was derived from a study published by O'Brien et al. in 2007. Comparative regimens of vancomycin were: (i) injectable used orally, 125 mg four times daily (qid; WAC of $US6/day), with use of vancomycin hydrochloride (HCl) capsules, 125 mg qid (WAC of $US106/day) post-hospital discharge; (ii) vancomycin HCl capsules, 125 mg qid; and (iii) vancomycin HCl capsules, 250 mg qid (WAC of $US196/day). Findings are expressed in 2011 US dollars. The study perspective is that of the US health system.
Results: The warranted price per day for fidaxomicin represented 95% of the WAC per day for fidaxomicin compared with use of injectable vancomycin (orally) 125 mg qid (with subsequent use of vancomycin HCl capsules, 125 mg qid post-hospital discharge); 109% of the WAC per day for fidaxomicin compared with use of vancomycin HCl capsules, 125 mg qid; and 141% of the WAC per day for fidaxomicin when compared with use of vancomycin HCl capsules, 250 mg qid.
Conclusion: From the perspective of the US health system, fidaxomicin represents value for money in the treatment of CDAD. The methodology employed in this research has application beyond antimicrobial pharmacotherapy.
Figures
Comment in
-
Fidaxomicin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea.Clin Drug Investig. 2013 Jan;33(1):93-4. doi: 10.1007/s40261-012-0044-y. Clin Drug Investig. 2013. PMID: 23233241 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD004610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004610.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28257555 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin as a First-Line Treatment for Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea in Specific Patient Populations: A Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation.Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Dec;37(12):1489-1497. doi: 10.1002/phar.2049. Epub 2017 Nov 27. Pharmacotherapy. 2017. PMID: 29044643 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of first recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection: fidaxomicin versus vancomycin.Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S154-61. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis462. Clin Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22752865 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection.N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):422-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910812. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21288078 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety analysis of fidaxomicin in comparison with oral vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infections.Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S110-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis390. Clin Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22752858 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin for the Treatment of a First Episode of Clostridium Difficile Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.Cureus. 2018 Jun 11;10(6):e2778. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2778. Cureus. 2018. PMID: 30112254 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clostridium difficile infection in the elderly: an update on management.Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Oct 24;12:1799-1809. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S149089. eCollection 2017. Clin Interv Aging. 2017. PMID: 29123385 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Economic burden of Clostridium difficile in five hospitals of the Florence health care system in Italy.Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015 Nov 18;8:207-13. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S90513. eCollection 2015. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015. PMID: 26604846 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness and pricing of antibacterial drugs.Chem Biol Drug Des. 2015 Jan;85(1):4-13. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.12417. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2015. PMID: 25521641 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in Clostridium difficile infection.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Nov;69(11):2901-12. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku257. Epub 2014 Aug 5. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014. PMID: 25096079 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cohen S.H., Gerding D.N., Johnson S., et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA) Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431–55. doi: 10.1086/651706. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dificid® [package insert]. San Diego (CA): Optimer Pharmaceuticals, August, 2011
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
